yaclt VS yargs

Looking for contributors for my open source changelog tool. I am looking for people to help do code reviews in order to get PRs merged, contributors to help fix bugs, implement new features, and provide technical input, as well as creating a project roadmap and filing new feature request issues.

Check out yargs . That’s what I use for my open source changelog tool

yargs and commander are two foundational libraries to help us parse parameters as mentioned above. They provide very basic functions to serve as a foundation for other libraries.

Your tool now automates project setup, but there's room for improvement. Consider adding more features or handling user input to customize the project structure. Explore packages like yargs for parsing command-line arguments. You can learn more about yargs through their official documentation here.

This code snippet uses yargs, a Node.js package, to parse command-line arguments in a POSIX-compliant way, including support for short and long-form options. You could also use the popular commander defined as a complete node.js command-line interface.

This feature was implemented by adding a new argument option -l or --lang in yargs as below.

Creating CLIs with yargs is a piece of cake. For LZ4 there is a streaming implementation on npm which is a single function and also happened to decompress my files without any errors. Everything else is out-of-box Node.js.

Backend is more tricky. - RESTful APIs I prefer Koajs - For a RPC/microsevice, I have only used gRPC - For a CLI, yargs and inquirer

To accomplish this task, I added a new option using the yargs module. This allows me to read whatever the user inputs after using -l/--l. Following this, I added a conditional statement that defaults to en-CA whenever a language code is not inputted.