xni VS pygit2

Compare xni vs pygit2 and see what are their differences.

xni

A possible new C API for extending Ruby impls (by headius)

pygit2

Python bindings for libgit2 (by libgit2)
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
xni pygit2
1 1
7 1,574
- -0.1%
0.0 9.1
almost 10 years ago 12 days ago
Java Python
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

xni

Posts with mentions or reviews of xni. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-03-29.
  • Hello, HPy
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 29 Mar 2021
    We have this same problem in Ruby - implementing the Ruby C extension API if you aren't exactly the same as the reference Ruby implementation is extremely challenging. I think Charlie Nutter proposed something like this for Ruby in the past https://github.com/headius/xni.

pygit2

Posts with mentions or reviews of pygit2. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-03-29.
  • Hello, HPy
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 29 Mar 2021
    It still is, and Cython is great for accelerating critical Python code.

    A C extension is far preferable when you want to code in C, either to write a new data type[1], or write a Python frontend to a C library[2] that is too complex to be well supported by simple FFI.

    I think people use Cython more internally when they value the maintainability of "mostly Python" over the fact that it's slower than what native C would get them.

    [1]: https://github.com/tobgu/pyrsistent

    [2]: https://github.com/libgit2/pygit2

What are some alternatives?

When comparing xni and pygit2 you can also consider the following projects:

Pyrsistent - Persistent/Immutable/Functional data structures for Python

libgit2 - A cross-platform, linkable library implementation of Git that you can use in your application.

Guitar - Git GUI Client

tig - Text-mode interface for git

gti - a git launcher :-)

RustPython - A Python Interpreter written in Rust