woo VS ulisp

Can I ask you this though? Again, all I have in my file is what's under the "Start a server" section of the woo readme.

For example, let's look at this project: https://github.com/fukamachi/woo

One of the nice things about Common Lisp is that it also has the fastest web server: https://github.com/fukamachi/woo

Here you have a web server written in Chez Scheme: https://github.com/guenchi/Igropyr So you see that Lisp is very suitable for web applications. Another project that proves that Lisp is excellent for web servers is Woo: https://github.com/fukamachi/woo

I remember a long time ago when I checked out woo https://github.com/fukamachi/woo it still had the same warning "This software is still BETA quality." Is that really still the case? As of now, I'm seeing the last update was only 4 days ago, so it looks like it's been worked on relatively actively this whole time.

I love his projects too. He's also the creator of uLisp.

http://www.ulisp.com/

Not CL, but there is ulisp (http://www.ulisp.com/) for microcontrollers, supposed to be really tiny, and there is Carp (https://github.com/carp-lang/Carp) which is without a GC so seems suitable for real-time stuff.

There's also ulisp (for Arduino projects etc.): http://www.ulisp.com/

This is larger, because there are functions for accessing peripherals, and the core is more standard lispy with 'caadr' et.al., and it has a compacting GC, so images can be saved as a compact blob.

You might consider uLisp, it's very Common Lispy for the memory constraints given (sans macros and splicing quote). And you can still connect to it and save an image. I've tried it and it works well enough. Here is the homepage.

Agreed - the interactivity is good. Lisp is close (have you seen http://www.ulisp.com/ - I can't believe they got into into that small a target!). Python is ok, but for some reason I don't use the REPL in the same way I do in Forth - I think calling functions is just harder somehow. Mostly is exploring valves from the Python REPL.