webnn
py2wasm
| webnn | py2wasm | |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 1 | |
| 316 | 51 | |
| 1.9% | - | |
| 9.3 | 0.0 | |
| 6 days ago | 28 days ago | |
| Bikeshed | ||
| GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
webnn
- Py2wasm – A Python to WASM Compiler
-
Ask HN: What's the idea behind the WebNN API?
The WebNN API will make it possible to run AI models in the browser: https://www.w3.org/TR/webnn/
The idea of having AI in browsers (see the "Application Use Cases") seems cool, but on the other hand, the idea of downloading & storing large models for each website/webapp seems terrible.
It seems to me that it would make more sense to have models built into browsers, and to have a web API that provides standardized ways to interact with the underlying models of each browser. From what I have understood from the WebNN spec, though, despite listing out all of the cool use-cases, the API doesn't seem intended to provide higher level functionality than loading, running & performing operations on a model.
Is my understanding of the API right, or is there something else that uses it to make these use-cases available in browsers?
- Deno 1.39: The Return of WebGPU
- W3C Candidate Recommendation Draft: Web Neural Network API
- WebNN: Web Neural Network API
py2wasm
-
Py2wasm – A Python to WASM Compiler
So I had a look at the repo/branches at https://github.com/wasmerio/py2wasm. This might be a nit, but in the spirit of OSS: if I'd done this work, I'd have contributed it to upstream Nuitka, I would not have forked a whole new GitHub repo and given it a completely different name.
What's the rationale for creating a new project and calling it py2wasm? Am I missing something?