webappsec-permissions-policy
contain-facebook
webappsec-permissions-policy | contain-facebook | |
---|---|---|
5 | 27 | |
392 | 954 | |
0.0% | 1.0% | |
6.9 | 7.8 | |
7 days ago | 29 days ago | |
Bikeshed | JavaScript | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | Mozilla Public License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
webappsec-permissions-policy
-
Smart Move, Google
Thanks for the docs. The examples (2 & 3, https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-permissions-policy/blob/mai...) seem to me to say that search.google.com can’t grant location permissions to an iframe if the parent was forbidden them, but I didn't find an explicit example for what happens if the iframe domain already got permission previously.
As you say the UI for requesting in this case would be weird, and this seems like a big security hole to me, but I can’t see a bit of the spec that explicitly forbids (though I only scanned the doc.)
-
Amazon is blocking Google’s FLoC
there is apparently no way to define a default disable either, so to turn off all the random features, the header becomes huge.
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-permissions-policy/issues/1...
What is happening in w3c?!
-
Optimise your site - Addressing recommendations from securityheaders.com
This took a fair bit of investigation. I'm not convinced that it's the most well-documented header, in terms of the properties that you can set. Effectively, this is a list of values that determine which permissions are allowed for this website. Given I don't need access to location, camera, microphone or accelerometer. I did have issues finding consistent documentation on this one, so ended up having to combine the Feature-Policy documentation from MDN as well as the permissions policy examples from w3c.
-
User-Agent Client-Hints, take 2
Since Chrome v84 the Chrome team has had a few set backs which has resulted in some changes. In addition, the feature policy header, for delegating the client hints to third parties, has changed name to Permissions-Policy.
contain-facebook
-
Threads passes 2M sign ups in the first 2 hours
Hm, last official release was 8 months ago. The github page looks fairly active, and there is a fix merged already for this https://github.com/mozilla/contain-facebook/pull/936 and once issue #933 gets merged, it will generate a source release for 2.3.11 at https://github.com/mozilla/contain-facebook/releases which will probably become 2.3.12 on AMO after some manual intervention.
-
I have 49 add-ons enabled, how can I switch between a different configuration of addons as needed ? (other than running a private window)
31. Facebook Container 2.3.9 (Disabled) Facebook Container isolates your Facebook activity from the rest of your web activity in order to prevent Facebook from tracking you outside of the Facebook website via third party cookies. https://github.com/mozilla/contain-facebook
-
Lifelong Chrome user switching to Firefox, are there any extensions that are a MUST on the browser?
Facebook Container
-
Smart Move, Google
This morning I looked for a similar extension for Google and I've found this fork[1] of Mozilla's extension. It's working as expected so far but I'd love for it to be officially maintained by Mozilla at some point. There is an open issue about it[2].
[0] https://github.com/mozilla/contain-facebook
-
FF 104.0.2 menu bar
Okay nevermind, that was broken due to Facebook Container https://github.com/mozilla/contain-facebook/issues/858
-
Firefox showing dark text on dark backgrounds while using dark mode
It’s because of Facebook container. Here is a GH issue with a fix: https://github.com/mozilla/contain-facebook/issues/867
- Firefox Facebook Container update overwrites body fonts for all sites
- The newest version of "Facebook Container" add-on (2.3.3) changes the CSS of the websites
-
Firefox broken with Facebook / Meta websites. Help?
There's an open issue and workaround for it here.
-
Can I make Facebook Container open new tab as default?
That's a Multi-Account Containers option, but ApertureNext uses the dedicated Facebook Container extension. It has an open feature request for this feature.
What are some alternatives?
ichnaea - Mozilla Ichnaea
noscript - The popular NoScript Security Suite browser extension.
OsmAnd - OsmAnd
firefox-container-proxy - [Firefox extension] Assign a proxy to a Firefox container
webappsec-feature-policy - A mechanism to selectively enable and disable browser features and APIs [Moved to: https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-permissions-policy]
Why-you-should-avoid-Google-AMP - An article on what Google AMP is, how it is destroying the openness of the Internet, and how to stop using it.
ua-client-hints - Wouldn't it be nice if `User-Agent` was a (set of) client hints?
Content-Type-Fixer-extension - Firefox extension to override dumb Content-Type headers with correct values
invidious-redirect - A (very) small WebExtension to redirect YouTube links to Invidious.
ViewImage - Extension to re-implement the "View Image" and "Search by image" buttons into google images.
hosts - 🔒 Consolidating and extending hosts files from several well-curated sources. Optionally pick extensions for porn, social media, and other categories.
contain-google - [Looking for maintainer] - Google Container isolates your Google activity from the rest of your web activity in order to prevent Google from tracking you outside of the Google website via third party cookies.