web-frameworks-benchmark VS ccls

I wish there was benchmarks for IDEs/editors, just like there are benchmarks for web frameworks (https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/ https://web-frameworks-benchmark.netlify.app/).

For instance, given the same simple Java program/project:

1. Clock time from selecting "Run" in the IDE to first line written to stdout (to measure startup time)

Thank you for taking the time to provide such elaborate answer! I really appreciate it! So given all this, what is the biggest benefit in using for example phoenix, with concurrency over let’s say nestjs which also scores very high on the benchmarks, as well as phalcon for php. These don’t use concurrency as a selling point however compared with Phoenix/elixir. I’m referring to https://web-frameworks-benchmark.netlify.app/

Link: https://web-frameworks-benchmark.netlify.app/ Github: https://github.com/SuspiciousLookingOwl/web-frameworks-benchmark

Then it would just have a dependency on Clang, and you couldn't use Emacs at all (since you can't use Clang).

AFAIK, the only alternative to the clangd language server is ccls: https://github.com/MaskRay/ccls

The base config adds about 15 lines (I have extra settings adding another 15 lines), then each language server adds a few lines per augroup. Example config for ccls.

"" https://github.com/MaskRay/ccls/wiki/vim-lsp if executable('ccls') augroup lsp_ccls ....

Try ccls instead, it has setup instructions for many LSP clients in the wiki: https://github.com/MaskRay/ccls

vim-lsp and ccls, supertab for auto-completion

these days a good lsp plugin will get you 90% of what you need for most languages and codebases. once youve got that set up its just a matter of picking lsp servers. i use ccls for c/c++. if you set it up and its not giving you hints for godot classes you probably have to point ccls at the proper godot-cpp subdirs using a .ccls file in your project root.

I installed ccls using snap for ubuntu.

C++/C language server: ccls

ccls: https://github.com/MaskRay/ccls/issues/798