vscode-python VS Pipenv

Ah, Chrome and slow spinners.

Python tests were taking ages on VSCode due to an SVG spinner:

https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=103626...

https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-python/issues/9216

It seems to be a problem caused by the new version of the Python extension. Here is a GitHub link for you to follow up.

For the python extension, please file your issue here: https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-python/issues

There seems to be a focus on feature velocity, and as the big parts start to stabilize (language server stuff, refactoring, extension framework, general UI/UX expectations), I hope we'll see some more attention paid to the default experience. But changing defaults in an ecosystem where users embrace configurability is tough, see the pythonPath fiasco, so I don't know the way forward. Core dev Brett Cannon seems to support the opinionated path for the VSCode Python experience going forward, so we'll see where that takes us.

I filed a GitHub report, you can always follow up.

Jedi said it had a fix on this post which links to this but isn't that just the Jedi source code showing fixes? The only reference I see in there is " Autocomplete inherited methods when overriding in child class ", but I just want it to autocomplete when typing a method from the parent class on a subclass instance.

If you still want to use python3.3.1 in vscode, you can submit a report on GitHub to consult the official staff.

It works fine on my machine after testing, can you provide your test code and show your personal settings(settings.json)? If you are convinced that this is a problem with python extensions, you can file a report on GitHub.

Does this help? Maybe you are opening the workspace at the wrong folder level?

Actually, it looks like it might be an issue with syntax highlighting ("Intellisense" in MS terminology) in Microsoft VS Code. Here is almost an identical post to mine in their forum.

pipenv solves this by having both kinds of requirement files: Pipfile lists package names and known constraints on which versions can be used, while Pipfile.lock gives specific package versions with hashes. Theoretically the Pipfile (and its lockfile) format were supposed to be a standard that many different tools could use, but I haven't seen it get adopted much outside of pipenv itself, so I'm not sure if it's really going to catch on.

* Tons of longstanding bugs that fail to be resolved in any sort of timely manner like this one: https://github.com/pypa/pipenv/issues/2413

I am sick and tired of the python packaging space pushing this godawful tool for Python. Please just use pip-tools or poetry instead.

ℹ️ You may use a different virtual environment manager like Pipenv or poetry.

Hey lua would you mind looking at this question for me? https://github.com/pypa/pipenv/discussions/5411

Alternatively, you can look into Pipenv, which has a lot more tools to develop secure applications with.

https://github.com/pypa/pipenv/releases https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?search=pipenv (pipenv-2021.5.29-7.fc35 for the current Fedora release)