vim-ai VS ChatGPT.nvim

I use https://github.com/aduros/ai.vim. But my use case is mostly for generating stub code documentation and improving my writing so it might not apply for your use case. I also have my eye on https://github.com/madox2/vim-ai but I really like the workflow of ai.vim.

I would also like to announce a Community Wiki and invite you all to contribute. You might find useful especially a collection of prompts that can be used (not only) with the vim-ai plugin, or custom commands section that contains commands extending basic functionality such as suggesting a git commit message :GitCommitMessage.

I am working on integrating OpenAI and ChatGPT into Vim: https://github.com/madox2/vim-ai

vim-ai - 70, generate + refactor, again, offers the cursor.so functionality but in limited, will just replace all your selected text fashion.

You might find useful vim-ai plugin: https://github.com/madox2/vim-ai

Hi everyone, I am tying to integrate gpt-3.5-turbo for my vim plugin to generate/complete text (https://github.com/madox2/vim-ai ).

That would have to be a change to ChatGPT.nvim

need to mod https://github.com/jackmort/chatgpt.nvim to use copilot or ollama

> A bit off-topic, but I wonder how much Copilot/GPT cuts into the market share of editors like vim and emacs.

So you think that the two editors that have been around for nearly 100 years combined and are extremely customizable and have survived every coding fad, language and technology trend, is in danger from AI features?

Short answer: no.

Both Emacs and Neovim has first class support/implementations of Co-Pilot and GPT plugins.

For example ChatGPT.nvim [1].

[1]: https://github.com/jackMort/ChatGPT.nvim

There's also https://github.com/jackMort/ChatGPT.nvim

Anyways. Yes, neovim has AI integration like copilot ( https://github.com/github/copilot.vim ) and chatgpt ( https://github.com/jackMort/ChatGPT.nvim )

I use it with https://github.com/jackMort/ChatGPT.nvim . But pick your favorite chatgpt agent...