unnamed-gopher-client VS gopher-plus

It doesn't support Gemini (yet) but here's my take at a modern, fully-featured Gopher client: https://github.com/zenoamaro/unnamed-gopher-client

I tend to spend hours browsing Gopherholes, so I implemented a navigation system that I have yet to see in any other Gopher client (or web, for that matter): Drill-down Columnar Navigation. It is heavily inspired by Finder's own column navigation, so if you like that, you'll be at home.

In addition, it has other features that every modern browser should have:

* A tabbed interface

Shameless plug: I recently wrote a gopher client library for Deno, just for fun. https://github.com/matt1/deno-gopher

I also cleaned-up the weird formatting of the Gopher+ protocol and put it on github as a formatted markdown file since it was never and official RFC so trawling through an unstructured txt file when trying to implement the protocol was a pain: https://github.com/gopher-protocol/gopher-plus

Hope it is useful for someone implementing new gopher code like I was! :)

I think it is a bit of a chicken and an egg problem. There are a few Gopher+ servers out there, and the Gopher+ protocol is pretty flexible and designed with the metaverse in mind originally (see GopherVR from the original authors).

It is a shame that a lot of current Gopher users seem to be strongly against anything apart from standard Gopher, when the original authors of the protocol had much grander ideas for interactivity & visual interfaces. Sigh.

For anyone interested, the Gopher+ protocol doc never made it to a proper RFC, but is on github in a hyper-linked format to make it easier to read: https://github.com/gopher-protocol/gopher-plus/blob/main/gop...

https://github.com/gopher-protocol/gopher-plus/blob/main/gop... specifically mentions 3D representations of Gopherspace.