h3 VS vite

H3 is a small and delightful webserver. It honestly won me over the second I saw how simple the server side implementation of websockets was. It's actually so good, it even has bindings for uploadthing

Same, I'll probably move to https://github.com/unjs/h3 since it's used anyway in Nuxt (which I use for other projects)

import formidable from 'formidable'; /* global defineEventHandler, getRequestHeaders, readBody */ /** * @see https://nuxt.com/docs/guide/concepts/server-engine * @see https://github.com/unjs/h3 */ export default defineEventHandler(async (event) => { let body; const headers = getRequestHeaders(event); if (headers['content-type']?.includes('multipart/form-data')) { body = await parseMultipartNodeRequest(event.node.req); } else { body = await readBody(event); } console.log(body); return { ok: true }; });

import formidable from 'formidable'; /** * @see https://nuxt.com/docs/guide/concepts/server-engine * @see https://github.com/unjs/h3 */ export default defineEventHandler(async (event) => { let body; const headers = getRequestHeaders(event); if (headers['content-type']?.includes('multipart/form-data')) { body = await parseMultipartNodeRequest(event.node.req); } else { body = await readBody(event); } console.log(body); return { ok: true }; }); /** * @param {import('http').IncomingMessage} req */ function parseMultipartNodeRequest(req) { return new Promise((resolve, reject) => { /** @see https://github.com/node-formidable/formidable/ */ const form = formidable({ multiples: true }) form.parse(req, (error, fields, files) => { if (error) { reject(error); return; } resolve({ ...fields, ...files }); }); }); }

You could probably do all that in Nuxt with building a backend in the server folder. (More info here: https://nuxt.com/docs/guide/directory-structure/server) But, I understand that the official Nuxt 3 Auth module is being worked on which should make life a lot easier. For now, there's something new you can look into, namely the session support in the newest Nitro version (which is the backend part of Nuxt 3). There's some info here: https://github.com/unjs/h3/pull/315. I should not that I have not looked at this yet, though.

h3 - a minimalistic and simple node.js framework

Nuxt 3 is powered by a new server engine called Nitro. Nitro is used in development and production. It includes cross-platform support for Node.js, Browsers, and service-workers and serverless support out-of-the-box. Other features include API routes, automatic code-splitting, async-loaded chunks, and hybrid static/serverless modes. Server API endpoints and Middleware that internally uses h3 are added by Nitro.

For the frontend of "I Disappear," I leverage the automated build & deploy system provided by Netlify, which seamlessly integrates with Vite. This setup ensures that every deployment is optimized for performance, utilizing Vite’s modern build tools to enhance speed and efficiency.

Given our team's collective proficiency within the React ecosystem, we decided to leverage this expertise for our project. Initially, we contemplated utilizing Next.js; however, due to the limited practical experience with this technology among key engineers and the pressing timeline to develop the first prototype, we opted for a Single Page Application(SPA) approach. For bundling, we selected Vite, primarily due to its super fast build times, simplicity of configuration, and potential for a nearly seamless transition to server-side rendering.

We are continuing to add new project templates for various types of projects, and we've recently created one for the infamous combination of React with Vite tooling.

Vite focuses on providing an extremely fast development server and workflow speed in web development. It uses its own ES module imports during development, speeding up the startup time.

Vite and Next.js are both top 5 modern development framework right now. They are both great depending on your use case so we’ll discuss 4 areas: Architecture, main features, developer experience and production readiness. After learning about these we’ll have a better idea of which one is best for your project.

import { defineConfig } from 'vite' import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react-swc' import path from 'path' // https://vitejs.dev/config/ export default defineConfig({ plugins: [react()], server: { port: 3000 }, css: { devSourcemap: true }, resolve: { alias: { '~': path.resolve(__dirname, './src') } } })

I am currently utilizing Vite:

Homepage: https://vitejs.dev/

Without any adding any dependencies you can connect react props to raw css at runtime with nothing but css variables (aka "custom properties"). If you add CSS modules on top you don't have to worry about affecting the global scope so components created in this way can be truly modular and transferrable. I use this with vite.

Little confused as to why it has vite in it‘s name, it seems unrelated to https://vitejs.dev/