universal VS vite

Going to the source code of the CommonEngine we have this:

Angular executes applications in the browser and renders pages in the DOM by default. This default method of rendering in the client comes with disadvantages like poor performance and lack of visibility for search engine crawlers. Luckily, Angular allows us to opt-in for server-side rendering (SSR) through Angular Universal, its official SSR solution.

Example rules based on Angular Universal's gotchas:

About standalone support there's this issue in angular/universal and yes, it is supported now 🥳 Tomorrow I'll try making it work in local

Actually I notice in the last few days they might have done a fix for it = https://github.com/angular/universal/issues/1795

export function app(): express.Express { const server = express(); const distFolder = join(BROWSER_FILES_BASE_PATH, 'angular'); const indexHtml = existsSync(join(distFolder, 'index.original.html')) ? 'index.original.html' : 'index'; // Our Universal express-engine (found @ https://github.com/angular/universal/tree/main/modules/express-engine) server.engine( 'html', ngExpressEngine({ bootstrap: AppServerModule, }) ); server.set('view engine', 'html'); server.set('views', distFolder); server.use( '/browser', express.static(join(BROWSER_FILES_BASE_PATH, 'remix'), { immutable: true, maxAge: '1y', }) ); server.get( '/remix*', createRequestHandler({ build: require('../build/server/remix'), }) ); // Example Express Rest API endpoints // server.get('/api/**', (req, res) => { }); // Serve static files from /browser server.get( '*.*', express.static(distFolder, { maxAge: '1y', }) ); // All regular routes use the Universal engine server.get('*', (req, res) => { res.render(indexHtml, { req, providers: [{ provide: APP_BASE_HREF, useValue: req.baseUrl }], }); }); return server; }

I've located the module that already deals with the GET requests = https://github.com/angular/universal/blob/main/modules/common/src/transfer_http.ts So I've made my own interceptor and replaced the GETs mentioed on lines 75 and 95, however it doesn't seem to work. Only thing I can see is the original code references BrowserTransferStateModule which is crossed out. Do I need to replace that with something else?

Do you inject a token that is provided by SSR? Even though standalone has not reached ExpressEngine, but if you have the root AppModule and the root AppComponent non standalone, you can still use provideHttpClient. To inject a server provided string (specifically, the serverUrl), you can use inject function like this:

For the frontend of "I Disappear," I leverage the automated build & deploy system provided by Netlify, which seamlessly integrates with Vite. This setup ensures that every deployment is optimized for performance, utilizing Vite’s modern build tools to enhance speed and efficiency.

Given our team's collective proficiency within the React ecosystem, we decided to leverage this expertise for our project. Initially, we contemplated utilizing Next.js; however, due to the limited practical experience with this technology among key engineers and the pressing timeline to develop the first prototype, we opted for a Single Page Application(SPA) approach. For bundling, we selected Vite, primarily due to its super fast build times, simplicity of configuration, and potential for a nearly seamless transition to server-side rendering.

We are continuing to add new project templates for various types of projects, and we've recently created one for the infamous combination of React with Vite tooling.

Vite focuses on providing an extremely fast development server and workflow speed in web development. It uses its own ES module imports during development, speeding up the startup time.

Vite and Next.js are both top 5 modern development framework right now. They are both great depending on your use case so we’ll discuss 4 areas: Architecture, main features, developer experience and production readiness. After learning about these we’ll have a better idea of which one is best for your project.

import { defineConfig } from 'vite' import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react-swc' import path from 'path' // https://vitejs.dev/config/ export default defineConfig({ plugins: [react()], server: { port: 3000 }, css: { devSourcemap: true }, resolve: { alias: { '~': path.resolve(__dirname, './src') } } })

I am currently utilizing Vite:

Homepage: https://vitejs.dev/

Without any adding any dependencies you can connect react props to raw css at runtime with nothing but css variables (aka "custom properties"). If you add CSS modules on top you don't have to worry about affecting the global scope so components created in this way can be truly modular and transferrable. I use this with vite.

Little confused as to why it has vite in it‘s name, it seems unrelated to https://vitejs.dev/