ultimate-question VS turing-elm

Buddha-Darwinism aka Applying Universal Darwinism to evaluation of Terminal values: https://github.com/kiwi0fruit/ultimate-question/blob/master/articles/dxb.md

Though getting non-self in the Buddha-Darwinism from quasi-immortality leads to drastically different morals than Buddhism ones (which doesn't use quasi-immortality).

Especially multiverse paired with anthropic principle suffers from this. It happens because of the lack of solid novelty emergence mechanics. Attempts to fix it give us ad hock patches to not get Boltzmann brain variant as the most probable sentient life.

The Applying Universal Darwinism to evaluation of Terminal values article. Another title is Buddha-Darwinism on objective meaning of life separated from subjective meaning of life (Cosmogonic myth from Darwinian natural selection, Quasi-immortality, Free will, Buddhism-like illusion of “Self”).

P.S. Basically, that post was a recap of a part of the more poetic and “old school” article that I've written: Applying Universal Darwinism to evaluation of Terminal values. The article doesn't add anything important to the question of this post but mostly stretches Universal Darwinism in other direstions instead.

Text of the article: https://github.com/kiwi0fruit/ultimate-question/blob/master/articles/dxb.md

And here is a promotional article: Darwin-Buddhism on objective meaning of life separated from subjective meaning of life (Cosmogonic myth of Darwinian natural selection, Quasi-immortality, Free will, Buddhism-like illusion of “Self”).

Repo: https://github.com/ivxvm/turing-elm