awesome-css
w3fools
| awesome-css | w3fools | |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 18 | |
| 541 | 150 | |
| 2.4% | - | |
| 5.7 | 10.0 | |
| 7 days ago | almost 3 years ago | |
| CSS | ||
| - | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
awesome-css
- Programmi o siti ESSENZIALI per Web Developing
-
A Good Theme Framework For Developers But Also Povides Design Elements?
I just came across this though: https://github.com/uhub/awesome-css
w3fools
-
Most promoted and blocked domains among Kagi Search users
From what I understand a lot of it is residual. W3schools has always been directed at beginners, but it also used to be wrong rather frequently.
This site [0] used to be the hub for the hate and now has a message saying that w3schools has gotten better. If you're curious, they still have a link to the web archive that has all the mistakes documented.
[0] https://www.w3fools.com/
-
MDN Playground
https://www.w3fools.com/:
> When W3Fools was launched in 2011, the state of documentation for developers was poor. This site documented many content errors and issues with the W3Schools website. The Mozilla Developer Network was around but it did not have much support at the time.
> Today, W3Schools has largely resolved these issues and addressed the majority of the undersigned developers' concerns. For many beginners, W3Schools has structured tutorials and playgrounds that offer a decent learning experience. Do keep in mind: a more complete education will certainly include MDN and other reputable resources.
-
W3Schools Criticisms: what's so wrong with it?
It dates back to https://www.w3fools.com/ and specifically https://web.archive.org/web/20110412103745/http://w3fools.com/
- Programmi o siti ESSENZIALI per Web Developing
-
Top G
w3fools.com has all the details.
-
I have a disconnect between the definition of a content attribute and how it is being used in the lesson.
As an aside, when I was learning it was discouraged to use w3schools (https://www.w3fools.com/) but it seems some of those concerns aren't true anymore, but still, I'd highly recommend going to MDN docs before anything else: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Viewport_meta_tag
-
MDN vs caniuse (Which is more trustworthy for checking browser compatibility data)
It used to be not as accurate. There's even a site devoted to it.
-
المهتمين بالبرمجه ،، انصحوني
w3schools is very very bad. https://www.w3fools.com/
-
Why choose to copy a list with slices instead of copy(), deepcopy(), or list()??
I wish I shared your optimism. I've contacted them multiple times regarding bad material, and they've never fixed any issues. I was told during one conversation that they don't remove material; even if it's outright wrong. I won't be happy until there's an equivalent to https://www.w3fools.com/ for G4G.
- suggestion pls
What are some alternatives?
awesome-italia-remote - A list of remote-friendly or full-remote companies that targets Italian talents.
css-reference - CSS Reference: a free visual guide to the most popular CSS properties