typescript-runtime-type-benchmarks
typebox
typescript-runtime-type-benchmarks | typebox | |
---|---|---|
33 | 57 | |
560 | 4,265 | |
- | - | |
9.7 | 8.7 | |
4 days ago | 7 days ago | |
TypeScript | TypeScript | |
- | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
typescript-runtime-type-benchmarks
-
TypeScript please give us types
Has been heavily optimized, both in terms of its types and runtime performance. Even including the static parser, many types are about an order of magnitude more efficient than equivalent Zod. Early results show it as marginally faster than any validator currently published to typescript-runtime-type-benchmarks, not including more complex cases where (2) would give ArkType a much more significant advantage.
-
What are some of the best libraries you cannot work without?
Zod is a bit of an underdog but it is not fast, AJV which is slightly more common can validate and generate types too but requires using JSON syntax, TypeBox offers familiar syntax to Zod while still being JSON syntax in the background.
-
[AskTS] What do you think will be the future of runtime type checking?
First, they're not fast (runtime type checking benchmarks).
-
Typescript really hits the middle ground between extremely rigid statically typed languages on one extreme and no types at all dynamic languages on another extreme. Best type system
Aha, so you're using a library in Java for this. You know about libraries in TS for this, there are plenty of them btw, but you don't use them because it's so easy. Express has `any` type for `req.body` because authors don't care about this either and it's so easy. And TypeScript is the one to blame in that you prefer to work with `any` type for incoming data rather than validating it.
-
TypeBox: Runtime Type System Built on Industry Standards
It is so much faster than Zod that Zod basically doesn't show, https://moltar.github.io/typescript-runtime-type-benchmarks/ and according to bundlejs, https://bundlejs.com/?q=zod%2Czod%2C%40sinclair%2Ftypebox&treeshake=%5B*%5D%2C%5B%7B+default+%7D%5D%2C%5B*%5D&config=%7B%22analysis%22%3Atrue%7D, it is even smaller. I genuinely have no clue why Zod is this popular in 2023.
- What’s your favourite validation library?
-
TypeBox: Template Literals + Conditional Types at Runtime
TypeBox is a bit different to other libraries in this space where it's mostly intended to be used with a auxiliary JSON Schema validator. Although it provides a built in JSON Schema compiler (which is currently the fastest (not-AOT) runtime validator available for JavaScript today), it's equally intended to be used with validators like Ajv (or any other standards compliant validator)
-
Introducing ArkType: The first isomorphic type system for TS/JS
I do plan to add some direct comparisons to https://github.com/moltar/typescript-runtime-type-benchmarks as well but haven't had a chance yet.
-
Is using zod as the primary source of truth for Typescript types sensible/sustainable?
I think it's more of a case of the extremely low performance bar that's been set by the status quo (for even the simplest of validation structures). There's been a lot of focus on the TS type inference, and less on the runtime performance (which actually matters more as it does reduce operational costs). It probably wouldn't be such an issue if the performance was reasonable, but I mean here's the full breakdown https://moltar.github.io/typescript-runtime-type-benchmarks/.
-
Best schema validator for intellisense performance?
I found a benchmark for runtime performance, but I haven't found any for intellisense/editor performance.
typebox
-
Popular Libraries For Building Type-safe Web Application APIs
The documentation can be found here.
-
I write HTTP services in Go after 13 years (Mat Ryer, 2024)
So far I like the commonly used approach in the Typescript community best:
1. Create your Schema using https://zod.dev or https://github.com/sinclairzx81/typebox
2. Generate your Types from the schema. It's very simple to create partial or composite types, e.g. UpdateModel, InsertModels, Arrays of them, etc.
3. Most modern Frameworks have first class support for validation, like is a great example Fastify (with typebox). Just reuse your schema definition.
That is very easy, obvious and effective.
- Where DRY Applies
-
Has anybody used Typia library?
There's a ton of schema validators out there and most devs have their personal favorite. Mine was zod and is now typebox + ajv.
- I'm looking to use my openapi spec to dyanamically create types
-
How can I generate typescript types?
If you're willing to document your API with an OpenAPI schema, then it should be possible to generate TypeScript types based on the OpenAPI schema with something like openapi-typescript. Also, Typebox can generate JSON schemas, maybe it can be used to generate something that the front-end can also use?
-
[AskTS] What do you think will be the future of runtime type checking?
Well, I do provide extensibility for those bullet points you've listed to varying degrees (both schema and type representation), as well as offering a reference implementation for expressing a entirely different schema specification under the type system (specifically RFC8927 / JSON Type Definition). Reference implementation here. As for JSDoc, It's supported in code hints.
- TypeBox: Runtime Type System Built on Industry Standards
- TypeBox: A Type System for JavaScript built on Industry Standard Specifications
-
Building a modern gRPC-powered microservice using Node.js, Typescript, and Connect
In setting out to build this service, we wanted to use gRPC for its APIs. We’ve been reaching for REST when building APIs so far, primarily out of necessity, i.e., our public APIs needed auto-generated client SDKs and docs for developers working with them. We built those APIs with Fastify and Typebox but felt burned by a code-first approach to generating an OpenAPI spec. I’ll spare you the details and save that experience/learning for another article. Suffice it to say we love gRPC’s schema-first approach. This blog post summarizes our feelings well
What are some alternatives?
napi-rs - A framework for building compiled Node.js add-ons in Rust via Node-API
zod - TypeScript-first schema validation with static type inference
zod-to-json-schema - Converts Zod schemas to Json schemas
MikroORM - TypeScript ORM for Node.js based on Data Mapper, Unit of Work and Identity Map patterns. Supports MongoDB, MySQL, MariaDB, MS SQL Server, PostgreSQL and SQLite/libSQL databases.
ajv - The fastest JSON schema Validator. Supports JSON Schema draft-04/06/07/2019-09/2020-12 and JSON Type Definition (RFC8927)
.NET Runtime - .NET is a cross-platform runtime for cloud, mobile, desktop, and IoT apps.
class-validator - Decorator-based property validation for classes.
Wren - The Wren Programming Language. Wren is a small, fast, class-based concurrent scripting language.
openapi-typescript-validator - Generate typescript with ajv validation based on openapi schemas
Prisma - Next-generation ORM for Node.js & TypeScript | PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, SQLite, MongoDB and CockroachDB
ts-json-schema-generator - Generate JSON schema from your Typescript sources