type-plus
typelevel-parser
type-plus | typelevel-parser | |
---|---|---|
1 | 1 | |
358 | 141 | |
- | - | |
9.5 | 0.0 | |
5 days ago | about 2 months ago | |
TypeScript | TypeScript | |
MIT License | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
type-plus
-
Trying to Understand Copilot's Type Spaghetti
That’s just how type programming looks.
Here’s (https://github.com/unional/type-plus/blob/main/packages/type...) a human written example that’s well-factored and uses loads of subtypes to clarify what it’s doing - but it’s still going to read like the black tongue of Mordor to you if you’re not familiar with how this kind of type stuff is structured and used.
And factoring all that stuff out may help readability but it doesn’t help comprehension - try and trace what the actual underlying type definitions for some of those utility types like IdentityEqual<> are actually doing (look at https://github.com/unional/type-plus/blob/main/packages/type...) and realize the rabbit hole runs deep in this stuff.
typelevel-parser
-
Trying to Understand Copilot's Type Spaghetti
Yes, the idea that there's anything "superhuman" about this code is just an indication that the CEO has severe Dunning-Kruger syndrome. This 100% human TypeScript project, selected arbitrarily, is quite a bit more sophisticated than the example discussed here: https://github.com/anuraghazra/typelevel-parser
I don't know anything about the dev but I would wager that they are more "curious programming dork" than "superhuman god of Typescript."