type-fest VS tss-react

Related: https://github.com/sindresorhus/type-fest/blob/main/source/o...

Typescript doesn’t natively provide an Opaque type that we can use to define a string that has already been localized. If the data looks like a string, Typescript will consider it a string. We can however use utility types that simulate opaque types, like the Opaque definition in type-fest:

With these powerful features, you can create dynamic and expressive types. One last thing I want to mention before moving on, is that you can install libraries with which you can add more types to your project like type-fest or utility-types. These libraries contain a lot of useful types that you can use in your project.

Also, it’s not as restrictive as mutability tools — if you know what you are doing and want to ignore this limitation for a particular case, you can apply the -readonly modifier or the Writeable type from type-fest or ts-essentials.

Remember you can derive one type from another type so you can make sure they don't diverge. SetOptional type util

Some folks have built whole SQL databases and DSL compilers in the TS type system. These tend to be toy projects with disclaimers not to use them. But the type system being Turing complete[0] (for better or worse), pretty much whatever you can imagine. This project[1] is one I actually return to frequently for practical ideas.

0: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/14833

1: https://github.com/sindresorhus/type-fest

Have a look at SetRequired and SetOptional in type-fest

Try the Exact method provided by Type Fest, looks like it does what you're looking for

This is a fairly common scenario and available via libraries like type-fest or implementable with a couple lines of code.

What I meant is that the lib provides the tooling to do CSS-in-JS if you so choose. But it's not at all mandatory. There is a fully type safe class system you can rely on. Internally no CSS-in-JS is used. I personally do love CSS-in-JS (I'm the author of TSS) but I understand the case against it.

I'm not big on splitting things in neat little modules. Before we had logic.js structure.htm, styles.css then React suggested that logic and structure should be in the same file, it was the right move. Styles, in my oppignion, should be done in JS as well as well. I think that queries shouldn't be mangled with the UI stuffs.

Real-life examples: 1, 2, 3

Material UI v5 brought some amazing updates, but switching from JSS to Emotion had an arguably nasty side-effect: it was no longer as straightforward to group your component styles in classes. Fortunately, a fantastic library emerged that allowed developers to not only reduce the extreme pain from migrating all their classes from v4's makeStyles to emotion, but to also to continue to writing classes in practically the same syntax, with wonderful TS type-safety. This library was tss-react, and it was one of my favorite open source discoveries of 2021.

You can still use makeStyles with tss-react, as documented here: https://mui.com/guides/migration-v4/#2-use-tss-react. I've used it and it seemed to work quite well.

tss-react