ts-monorepo VS TypeScript

1. Linking libs with tsconfig paths. This approach involves setting a tsconfig.json paths object which maps the package name, to the local filesystem location. Eg. "paths": {"@org/lib":"../libs/lib"} - Nx uses this approach for their Integrated Monorepo configuration https://nx.dev/tutorials/integrated-repo-tutorial https://github.com/NiGhTTraX/ts-monorepo.

FYI I tried renaming packages/bar/index.ts to index.js and adding allowJs: true in its tsconfig.json and tsconfig.build.json and everything works as expected.

Give https://github.com/NiGhTTraX/ts-monorepo a try :) It uses path aliases to map your imports to the source code inside the monorepo.

Make sure you've copied the jest craco config and that you've set up path aliases accordingly.

You can check https://github.com/NiGhTTraX/ts-monorepo.

FWIW https://github.com/NiGhTTraX/ts-monorepo works in a similar way by using path aliases instead. The result is the same (imports resolve to monorepo source code), but this approach doesn't prevent you from publishing any of the packages (check the repo and the linked docs for more details).

You didn't give an example of how your imports look, but I'm assuming you're trying to use absolute imports for the lib files like from 'lib/src/...'. Project references don't rewrite the imports in any way, they just optimize the builds by caching referenced projects. You'll want to use path aliases instead. Feel free to check out https://github.com/NiGhTTraX/ts-monorepo for full examples.

You can use two tsconfig.json files and in one of them configure path aliases to map your package names to the source code, effectively "overriding" package.json#main. You can find examples here https://github.com/NiGhTTraX/ts-monorepo.

Here is one I liked that is very basic, although I removed lerna from it personally. Shows examples of package sharing and a bunch of popular libraries. Next not nuxt but you get the idea. https://github.com/NiGhTTraX/ts-monorepo

I can't give advice about the trademark, other than that I've been through this kind of thing before and it sucks.

What I can say... is that I love what you've been doing on your Deepkit, and I was horrified to hear that this was happening to you.

Seriously, I've only lurked in the community so far, but it's possibly the most forward-thinking foundational library in the web space that I've seen.

Strong typing with annotations that can simultaneously influence runtime ORM and frontend generation, while being fully compliant Typescript? A hand-rolled lightning-fast Typescript compiler that emits the runtime reflection capabilities? Full-fledged DI as an inherent part of the design, not an afterthought?

It's such an incredible blend of beautiful tooling with pragmatic applications.

For anyone curious about this, https://web.archive.org/web/20230916074647/https://deepkit.i... is a fascinating read.

https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/47658#issueco... provides context on why some of TypeScript's design goals around erasure hold it back from these features. My vision of the web is that it would be an even more vibrant and innovative place if TypeScript were to cast off those restrictions.

DeepKit actually solving this by implementing its own compiler, bytecode, and interpreter... it's truly incredible.

Marc, know that there are people out there who love your work, and who will continue to follow it avidly regardless of the name. You're doing amazing things.

This parser is not written in TS types, and this kind of pedantry (when claiming "no js here") is important. In fact, the parser includes both the use of ternary operators as well as the rest operator, both of which are absolutely not part of the type system and are most certainly part of JS.

While this tries to reach the levels of "TypeScript is Turing complete[1]" (which happens to be super cool), it is, in my humble opinion, not even remotely interesting.

[1] https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/14833

TypeScript- a strongly typed programming language that builds on JavaScript, giving you better tooling at any scale.

Type Safety TypeScript support is as good as Comlink, with all the type inference you expect.