transmission-material-ui VS telefunc

Compared with tRPC: https://github.com/brillout/telefunc/issues/9

For JavaScript based projects TeleFunc[1] can make development way simpler by 'removing' the need for an API.

[1]: https://telefunc.com/

- api routes (cloud functions) require another package (on purpose). see https://telefunc.com/ from the same maintainer

other than that, no gatchas i encountered. i would choose vite-plugin-ssr again.

Another suggestion to solve your problem could be to use telefunc

> My experience was that for the simplest use cases, the ergonomics were unbeatable.

Exactly.

> the “just a function” interface was a distraction and I found myself wishing for a more conventional RPC interface.

For real-time use cases, I agree. I believe functions are the wrong abstraction here for real-time. I do plan to support real-time but using a "it's just variables" abstraction instead, see https://github.com/brillout/telefunc/issues/36.

> cleverer abstractions usually mean more work overall to integrate everything and boring is better.

Yes, Telefunc's downside is that it requires a transformer. The Vite and Webpack one are reliable and used in production (using `es-module-lexer` under the hood). The hope here is that, as Telefunc's popularity grows, more and more stacks are reliably supported. Also, there is a prototype using Telefunc without a transformer at all, which works but needs polishing.

> I experimented with a higher-magic version of this a couple of years ago.

Neat, curious, is it on GitHub?

An alternativeto tRPC that I find easier to use is telefunc