todo-comments.nvim VS vimoutliner

Might be triggered by https://github.com/folke/todo-comments.nvim/issues/133

Hello everyone, I am a happy user of both fzf-lua and todo-comments.nvim. I will never thank the authors of these two very useful plugins enough. Now, given that there are a lot of people out there using both and that todo-comments only has a Trouble and a Telescope extension for navigating through the comments, I am wondering if someone ever came up with an fzf-lua extension for todo-comments.nvim. I haven't found it by a quick online search, but maybe someone is keeping it very well hidden in their dotfiles.

I am referring this as well as this this plugin.

For reference, I am referring to this plugin.

If the node isn't defined as a unique syntax token inside the grammar then you cannot change it with queries. You would need to have this change in the python TS grammar, or use a plugin that finds the nodes and changes them (like todo-comments.nvim)

It breaks the highlighting in todo-comments.nvim for me though.

Really depends what you're doing and writing. I'm in a customer facing role and need to often tag my lines with where they belong in my task list. So Folke's [Todo-Comments](https://github.com/folke/todo-comments.nvim) is super handy for me too. I use macros to quickly tag the entire line after I'm done writing it.

Others: todo_comments, comment.

I am partial with VimOutliner (with its checkbox plugin) https://github.com/vimoutliner/vimoutliner/blob/master/vimoutliner/plugin/votl_checkbox.otl