textidote
Spelling, grammar and style checking on LaTeX documents (by sylvainhalle)
hunspell
The most popular spellchecking library. (by hunspell)
| textidote | hunspell | |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 20 | |
| 894 | 2,007 | |
| - | 0.9% | |
| 7.0 | 7.7 | |
| about 2 months ago | 10 days ago | |
| Java | C++ | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 only | GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0 only |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
textidote
Posts with mentions or reviews of textidote.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-05-27.
-
Writing like a pro with vale & neovim
Otherwise you can have a look at TeXtidote, although I'm not sure whether it can be used as a null-ls source or if it only works as a stand-alone program.
-
Textidote
Hm, I can't reproduce the error. If I download the latest release https://github.com/sylvainhalle/textidote/releases/tag/v0.8.3 and run java -jar textidote.jar example.tex (with example.tex from the GitHub repository) the output is different from the output of java -jar textidote.jar --check en example.tex. In particular, the second command reports tex to be a spelling error and gives a ridiculous amount suggested spellings.
-
Grammarly integration in AUCTeX
Textidote is also based on languageTool. It doesn't use LSP, but it can generate nice browseable HTML to look at all of the errors. It's not emacs-specific, but there's a snippet in the README of how to integrate it with flycheck.
-
Grammar checker for scientific writing
Check out textidote too. It's languagetool understanding \LaTeX syntax, and you can set it for flycheck-checker. Emacs-langtool coupled with langtool-ignore-fonts is also good for \LaTeX documents. You may want to configure them to disable a few rules to reduce false positives.
- textidote: Spelling, grammar and style checking on LaTeX documents
-
spell checker for LaTeX files
I really like Textidote. It does spell and grammar checking: https://github.com/sylvainhalle/textidote
hunspell
Posts with mentions or reviews of hunspell.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-23.
-
Is GNU Aspell the best spell checker for emacs on macOS?
Hunspell seems popular as well. I believe it's the one used by Firefox and LibreOffice, and I think it's the system spell checker in MacOS already? 🤷♂️
-
Why don't common browsers use Soundex for spelling suggestions?
Almost all browsers use the Hunspell library for spell checking. You should investigate what methods it uses for stemming and suggesting corrections. How does that algorithm work for non-English languages? The main variation you will see between browsers in spelling suggestions is the base dictionary that is used.
-
Does anyone know how to change the dictionary that W10 pulls from? Ideally replace with Google's brain?
I don't think so. Looking at the Chromium source it appears to use Hunspell. This is an okay spell checker, but not AI based AFAIK, only "Morphological analysis, stemming and generation".
-
Autocorrect anything with Google as a go-to spell check
Are you familiar with Hunspell? Dictionaries are comprehensive enough to be part of different Office Suites, so I don't see them as constricted to autocorrect.
-
Spell checker
If you're using Linux or MacOS, you should try hunspell.
- hunspell version?
-
Text Editor that supports spelling and grammar checking.
i prefer and use hunspell
-
spell-check selected text?
One can implement Huntspell which is what all browsers use (for example when typing in text areas). Is very simple and is C++.
- COMO FAZER COM QUE MEU PROGRAMA IDENTIFIQUE QUE UMA PALAVRA NÃO EXISTE
- Documentation on writing a spell checker
What are some alternatives?
When comparing textidote and hunspell you can also consider the following projects:
ltex-ls - LTeX Language Server: LSP language server for LanguageTool :mag::heavy_check_mark: with support for LaTeX :mortar_board:, Markdown :pencil:, and others
SymSpell - SymSpell: 1 million times faster spelling correction & fuzzy search through Symmetric Delete spelling correction algorithm
grammar-guard.nvim - Grammar Guard is a Neovim plugin that checks your grammar as you write your LaTeX, Markdown or plain text document.
nuspell - 🖋️ Fast and safe spellchecking C++ library
vim-angry-reviewer - Vim plugin for style correction for academic writing and scientific papers
spellsitter.nvim - Treesitter powered spellchecker
lsp-ltex - lsp-mode ❤️ LTEX
WeCantSpell.Hunspell - A port of Hunspell v1 for .NET and .NET Standard
langtool-ignore-fonts - Force Emacs Langtool to ignore certain fonts. For example, this can be used to prevent langtool from highlighting LaTeX in math-mode.
cspell - A Spell Checker for Code!
Emacs-langtool - LanguageTool for Emacs
JamSpell - Modern spell checking library - accurate, fast, multi-language
textidote vs ltex-ls
hunspell vs SymSpell
textidote vs grammar-guard.nvim
hunspell vs nuspell
textidote vs vim-angry-reviewer
hunspell vs spellsitter.nvim
textidote vs lsp-ltex
hunspell vs WeCantSpell.Hunspell
textidote vs langtool-ignore-fonts
hunspell vs cspell
textidote vs Emacs-langtool
hunspell vs JamSpell