testkube-dashboard
proposal-bind-operator
testkube-dashboard | proposal-bind-operator | |
---|---|---|
1 | 8 | |
28 | 1,738 | |
- | 0.2% | |
9.3 | 0.0 | |
8 days ago | over 6 years ago | |
TypeScript | ||
MIT License | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
testkube-dashboard
-
Why Would Anyone Need JavaScript Generator Functions?
But createApi, as provided by RTK Query API, makes this quite a bit harder, or so it seems to me at least. How would you wrap createApi to provide such a functionality for every fetch by default?
[1]: https://github.com/kubeshop/testkube-dashboard
[2]: https://github.com/kubeshop/testkube-dashboard/tree/main/src...
proposal-bind-operator
-
Pipe Operator (|>) For JavaScript
There was also a different proposal that allows objects to be extended: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-bind-operator
Personally, I don't use classes much, but sometimes I think free functions a little bit hard to find, so I tend to experiment with the following pattern.
interface User { … }
const User = {
- Why Would Anyone Need JavaScript Generator Functions?
-
JavaScript Evolutsiyasi Qisqa Satrlarda!
Yangi bind operatori Function.prototype.bind ni yanada elegant tarzda ishlatish imkonini beruvchi yangi sintaksis
-
JavaScript tutorials
In modern JS, you can export each function directly without putting them in an object. It also allows you to call a function with a specific “this” value, function.bind(object)(args). As a matter of fact, there’s a syntax proposal proposal and to do exactly this, object::function(args). This proposal could make what you describe pretty popular.
-
Can't wrap my head around a thing about modules
Hey, not yet ;)
-
10+ Interesting ECMAScript Proposals
This binding syntax (::)
-
I've used the pipe() function 2,560 times and I can tell you it's good!
You'd need 4 periods.
-
[AskJS] Sensible Prototype Extensions?
I don't think you want realms so much as protocols or extensions, the latter assimilating the beloved bind operator.
What are some alternatives?
async-generator - Async generator module.
proposal-generator-arrow-functions - ECMAScript proposal: Generator Arrow Functions
foal-ts-monorepo - Boilerplate for building a volatility-based system using Foal for the server and Create React App for the client
proposal-relative-indexing-method - A TC39 proposal to add an .at() method to all the basic indexable classes (Array, String, TypedArray)
Bumble - A small JavaScript game framwork
proposal-observable - Observables for ECMAScript
Bumble-Asteroids - An asteroids like game built with the Bumble framework and using Entity Component System
proposal-pipeline-operator - A proposal for adding a useful pipe operator to JavaScript.
bitstream - Utilities for packing/unpacking fields in a bitstream
proposal-temporal - Provides standard objects and functions for working with dates and times.
trealla-js - Trealla Prolog for the web
proposal-as-patterns - `as` destructuring patterns