tech-proposals
The Haskell Foundation Tech Proposal Process (by haskellfoundation)
error-messages
By haskell
| tech-proposals | error-messages | |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | 18 | |
| 68 | 73 | |
| - | - | |
| 7.7 | 0.0 | |
| 9 days ago | almost 2 years ago | |
| Haskell | Haskell | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | - |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
tech-proposals
Posts with mentions or reviews of tech-proposals.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-06-23.
-
SAST options for Haskell projects?
As far as I know there is no such thing yet. The first step would be to actually collect the vulnerabilities in a central repository. The Haskell foundation has been working on such a repository, but I don't know the current status.
-
Dependency vulnerability scanning for Haskell
The Haskell foundation is working on An Advisory Repository for Haskell. That proposal also lists the necessary steps to get Dependabot support.
- Towards a better end-user experience in tooling
- Abstract filepath coming soon
- A tick-tock release cycle for GHC by bgamari · Pull Request #34 · haskellfoundation/tech-proposals
- GHC.X.hackage: A Hackage overlay to ease adoption of new GHC versions
-
Was simplified subsumption worth it for industry Haskell programmers?
One body that is in a position to coordinate such funding efforts is the Haskell Foundation. Some relevant discussion is happening at https://github.com/haskellfoundation/tech-proposals/pull/27. If your work is willing to contribute funding then perhaps it would be beneficial to nudging it along if you chimed in and said so.
- Haskell Foundation Community Grants (HFTP Proposal)
- Gil Mizrahi has posted the Haskell performance tuning book proposal, please check it out, give feedback, and volunteer your expertise!
error-messages
Posts with mentions or reviews of error-messages.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-04-27.
-
Why did GHC go from "occurs check failed" to talking about rigid type variables?
The GHC issue tracker or the error message improvement repo are two such places to get clarification (and potentially improve the message even if it turns out to be technically correct).
-
Please help!
Indeed there is a ticket and the error message is somewhat better in 9.4 although it still doesn't mention the guard.
-
What prevents Haskell from having good error messages?
Note that the Num literal issue is tracked here and there seems to be a good suggestion to fix it: https://github.com/haskell/error-messages/issues/5#issuecomment-1040788806
-
GHC: could not deduce [instance]
I think it would be great to post this over at https://github.com/haskell/error-messages too so that we can track it more easily than here on Reddit.
-
How to get better compiler error messages?
Also, reminder that https://github.com/haskell/error-messages exists to track these kind of issues. Feel free to open an issue there.
-
Unable to get this to compile
If you are able to articulate what aspects of the error messages you find hard to understand, please do open an issue on https://github.com/haskell/error-messages. (Or reply here then I can open an issue for you if you don't have a github account.) It doesn't have to be a concrete suggestion for improvement, even just knowing which messages are bad can be useful.
-
Another Confusing Haskell Error Message
Do you know about https://github.com/haskell/error-messages
-
Was simplified subsumption worth it for industry Haskell programmers?
The error message is at the least very unhelpful. Please report it on https://github.com/haskell/error-messages/issues/new
-
How do I specify the type inside function definition?
Please do open an issue at https://github.com/haskell/error-messages. The issue itself can be as simple as just summarizing what you wrote here, it doesn't have to immediately suggest a good alternative. That issue tracker is in the first place intended to document all error messages that Haskellers struggle with.
-
Haskell Error Messages: Come on!
Do check out https://github.com/haskell/error-messages. We have a related discussion here: https://github.com/haskell/error-messages/issues/5, but I think perhaps a separate issue for this case would be good to have.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing tech-proposals and error-messages you can also consider the following projects:
hlint - Haskell source code suggestions
ghc - Mirror of the Glasgow Haskell Compiler. Please submit issues and patches to GHC's Gitlab instance (https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc). First time contributors are encouraged to get started with the newcomers info (https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/wikis/contributing).
unix - POSIX functionality
error-message-index - A community-driven collection of documentation for Haskell error messages and warnings
Win32 - Haskell support for the Win32 API
ghc-proposals - Proposed compiler and language changes for GHC and GHC/Haskell
hpath - Typed filepath in haskell
pool-conduit - Persistence interface for Haskell allowing multiple storage methods.