sysethereum-agents
External agents for the Syscoin <=> Ethereum bridge (by syscoin)
dogethereum-contracts
Ethereum contracts for the Dogecoin <-> Ethereum bridge (by dogethereum)
| sysethereum-agents | dogethereum-contracts | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 60 | |
| - | - | |
| 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| over 2 years ago | about 1 year ago | |
| Java | TypeScript | |
| MIT License | MIT License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
sysethereum-agents
Posts with mentions or reviews of sysethereum-agents.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-02-13.
-
A coder finalized the Doge-Ethereum bridge
The agents are here: https://github.com/syscoin/sysethereum-agents
dogethereum-contracts
Posts with mentions or reviews of dogethereum-contracts.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-02-13.
-
A coder finalized the Doge-Ethereum bridge
The base of it I would guess is about 60% the same from dogeethereum but we made some changes because we deployed it as an asset interoperability bridge with Syscoin's assets. For Doge it wouldn't need any of that, we also are sha256 so we didn't need truebit. Some stuff we were looking at was zkSNARK/zkSTARK based verification of block headers now that zkp's are getting fairly optimized. There is some literature around Bitcoin but with merged-mining its more R1CS constraints. Since we have masternodes we were thinking of applying chainlocks with flyclient integration however for Doge I think using incentivized custodians is the only option, there were some bug fixes related to auxpow and general restructuring on agent and contracts like upgrading solidity and issues we found: https://github.com/dogethereum/dogethereum-contracts/issues/49
What are some alternatives?
When comparing sysethereum-agents and dogethereum-contracts you can also consider the following projects:
dogethereum-agents - External agents for the Dogecoin <-> Ethereum bridge
TypeChain - 🔌 TypeScript bindings for Ethereum smart contracts
dogecoin-vs-code - Check Dogecoin price easily and see how it goes to the moon 🚀🌜
sysethereum-docs - Documentation for the Syscoin <=> Ethereum bridge.