synquid | quil | |
---|---|---|
3 | 7 | |
113 | 2,928 | |
- | 0.1% | |
0.0 | 9.6 | |
about 2 years ago | 3 months ago | |
Haskell | Clojure | |
MIT License | Eclipse Public License 1.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
synquid
-
Show HN: Fructose, LLM calls as strongly typed functions
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnOix9TFy1A
Links to more projects and papers by Prof. Polikarpova: https://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~npolikarpova/
I think this is one of the main ones she discusses in the talk: https://github.com/nadia-polikarpova/synquid
-
_why's Estate
My first post was poorly written. I didn't mean to imply that taking pride in a job well done was bad. I don't think it is. I think programmers have plenty of reason to be happy when they do good work[1]--what I think is foolish is having visions of grandeur when it comes to programming, which in my opinion is what _why seemed to have based on his reasoning for quitting. I could be way off mark, but that's my take.
I mentioned this in another comment, but I think it also has to do with a confusion of categories. _why seemed to want recognition akin to that received by, e.g. Thomas Bernhard, Kafka, for something like shoes or his other software/libraries or general contributions to computing. But the issue is these things will always be utilities for specialists, and any aesthetic properties they have (elegant design, expression, etc.) are secondary to their functioning and they'll always be relegated to the dusty realm of specialists since the code is not the product--the software is. One can write code to create an aesthetic object that is enjoyed and revered by the masses, but I have a hard time envisioning a future in which the masses will ever enjoy and revere code or engineering for its own sake.
Pride was the wrong word to use and one I lazily reached for. After reading your comment, you've helped me realize that what I advise against is misapplication of expectations to different categories of things. _why seemed to want an aesthetic reception and legacy on a general, popular scale for work that is ultimately only a utility to the vast majority of the population and indeed, not even accessible to the population, and even if it were, I don't think many people would admire programming libs for fun--such a hobby will remain the lot of only enthusiasts. There is no pop coding like there is pop music.
[1]: Though I'd also argue that much of what you state taking pride in is not programming--which is just expressing ideas in programming languages--what you are talking about is engineering/design, which can be done perfectly well and separately from the programming part. we just happen to solve a lot of problems with computers these days so we need to express solutions for computers to consume and we tend to blend those responsibilities (we'll one day get to a point where the computers do most of the programming and we just design https://github.com/nadia-polikarpova/synquid)
-
Reverse of quickspec
Synquid synthesizes programs from refinement types, which are very similar in that you express a type-level predicate on the output using an expression which involves the input.
quil
-
Quil 4.3.1323 released
We’re pleased to announce Quil version 4.3.1323, the first general release of Quil in four years! You can find the jar at Clojars and the release notes at Github. Thanks to Clojurists Together for sponsoring this work! :)
-
Nannou – An open-source creative-coding framework for Rust
The quick run speed is great for shortening the feedback loop. I've had great experiences with Lisp-style environments for that reason, and the language is much higher level than Rust while still offering good performance. I've mainly used Quil, the Clojure wrapper around processing: https://github.com/quil/quil
-
Is Quil moving forward?
I can't seem to find any clear information on this, only bit and pieces on the repo https://github.com/quil/quil. It doesn't seem to get any updates and Processing 4 and Java 9, seems to brake. SO the project is dead right?
-
Lisp feature - domain specific language
https://github.com/quil/quil (drawing)
-
_why's Estate
Quil[0] repo has either a homage to _why, or _why has contributed the intro.
[0]: https://github.com/quil/quil
-
Is there any downside to learning p5js over Processing?
Maybe. I thought of using quil for my web enablement needs, but decided that with how few people know Clojurescript, I wouldn't be able to truly share the code in practice.
-
Clojure throws error in random iteration count in quil loop(cant find anything to run)
but if all your trying to do is get something running real quick using quil https://github.com/quil/quil/wiki/Installing
What are some alternatives?
skistrap - The mirror for _why's skistrap
metaid - MetAid is a tiny library for aiding metaprogramming.
active-forks - Find active github forks of a repo https://git.io/vSnrC
markaby - markup as ruby (official repository)
geom - 2D/3D geometry toolkit for Clojure/Clojurescript
rb_parse_args - The mirror for _why's rb_parse_args
nokhwa - Cross Platform Rust Library for Powerful Webcam/Camera Capture
chirrup - The mirror for _why's chirrup
min-love2d-fennel
ruby-rails - ruby&rails