sucrase
vite
Our great sponsors
sucrase | vite | |
---|---|---|
26 | 787 | |
5,583 | 64,769 | |
- | 1.8% | |
6.1 | 9.9 | |
2 months ago | about 10 hours ago | |
TypeScript | TypeScript | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
sucrase
-
Show HN: JSX in Browser with Sucrase
Thanks. As for the code compilation, that can be tested and seen in https://sucrase.io/
The demo page is only to show how we can transpile JSX in browsers.
-
Created a simple online JavaScript Playground, it's a place for you to try out your code and ideas.
Thanks u/OutlandishnessKey953, the playground built with React, Docusaurus(https://docusaurus.io/), CodeMirror(https://codemirror.net/), Sucrase(https://sucrase.io/), etc.
-
The TypeScript compiler is now implemented internally with modules
Hi, Sucrase author here.
To be clear, the benchmark in the README does not allow JIT warm-up. The Sucrase numbers would be better if it did. From testing just now (add `warmUp: true` to `benchmarkJest`), Sucrase is a little over 3x faster than swc if you allow warm-up, but it seemed unfair to disregard warm-up for the comparison in the README.
It's certainly fair to debate whether 360k lines of code is a realistic codebase size for the benchmark; the higher-scale the test case, the better Sucrase looks.
> worse it disables esbuild and swc's multi-threading
At some point I'm hoping to update the README benchmark to run all tools in parallel, which should be more convincing despite the added variability: https://github.com/alangpierce/sucrase/issues/730 . In an ideal environment, the results are pretty much the same as a per-core benchmark, but I do expect that Node's parallelism overhead and the JIT warm-up cost across many cores would make Sucrase less competitive than the current numbers.
-
Should i switch to Typescript?
First, npm i -D sucrase to install sucrase. Now you can do node -r sucrase/register ./index.ts to run TypeScript code directly with Node.
-
🚀 Building your own Javascript Library with bare minimum
As you might know there are a lot of Javascript bundlers out there, such as webpack, sucrase, parcel, rollup and etc. Bear in mind, not because they have thousands of stars on Github that means they're the best. sometimes new libs are as good as the popular ones but they're still building up their image/popularity in the community. what I bring today is a not sooooo, popular JS bundler called esbuild.
-
Five coding interview questions I hate
Sucrase JS was 2x the speed of esBuild and 50% faster than SWC last I checked.
-
I’m Porting the TypeScript Type Checker Tsc to Go
Webpack does way more than esbuild, including running a typechecking compiler instead of just transpiling, running compilers able to downlevel emit to ES5 and providing a deep plugin architecture allowing you to hook into any bit you like. But yes, it hasn't been designed with speed in mind - it has been designed with maximum extensibility instead. Its the same reason why Babel is slow compared to sucrase (written in JS, currently faster than SWC and esbuild but doing somewhat less - https://github.com/alangpierce/sucrase)
tsc has in fact been designed with speed in mind (I've been following the project since before it ended up on GitHub). Going beyond 1 order of magnitude performance improvement is highly unlikely.
- Sucrase: A fast, pure-JavaScript transpiler for JavaScript/TypeScript
- GitHub - alangpierce/sucrase: Super-fast alternative to Babel for when you can target modern JS runtimes
- Sucrase: A fast JavaScript/TypeScript transpiler written in JavaScript
vite
-
Setup React Typescript with Vite & ESLint
import { defineConfig } from 'vite' import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react-swc' import path from 'path' // https://vitejs.dev/config/ export default defineConfig({ plugins: [react()], server: { port: 3000 }, css: { devSourcemap: true }, resolve: { alias: { '~': path.resolve(__dirname, './src') } } })
-
Approaches to Styling React Components, Best Use Cases
I am currently utilizing Vite:
-
Getting started with TiniJS framework
Homepage: https://vitejs.dev/
-
Use CSS Variables to style react components on demand
Without any adding any dependencies you can connect react props to raw css at runtime with nothing but css variables (aka "custom properties"). If you add CSS modules on top you don't have to worry about affecting the global scope so components created in this way can be truly modular and transferrable. I use this with vite.
-
RubyJS-Vite
Little confused as to why it has vite in it‘s name, it seems unrelated to https://vitejs.dev/
-
Ask HN: How do we include JavaScript scripts in a browser these days?
it says in their docs that they recommend Vite https://vitejs.dev/
it goes like this.
1. you create a repo folder, you cd into it.
2. you create a client template using vite which can be plain typescript, or uses frameworks such as react or vue, at https://vitejs.dev/guide/
3. you cd in that client directory, you npm install, then you npm run dev, it should show you that it works at localhost:5173
4. you follow the instructions on your url, you do npm install @web3modal/wagmi @wagmi/core @wagmi/connectors viem
5. you follow the further instructions.
> It seems like this is for npm or yarn to pull from a remote repository maintained by @wagmi for instance. But then what?
you install the wagmi modules, then you import them in your js code, those code can run upon being loaded or upon user actions such as button clicks
> Do I just symlink to the node_modules directory somehow? Use browserify? Or these days I'd use webpack or whatever the cool kids are using these days?
no need for those. browserify is old school way of transpiling commonjs modules into browser-compatible modules. webpack is similar. vite replaces both webpack and browserify. vite also uses esbuild and swc under the hood which replaces babel.
> I totally get how node package management works ... for NODE. But all these client-side JS projects these days have docs that are clearly for the client-side but the ES2015 module examples they show seem to leave out all instructions for how to actually get the files there, as if it's obvious.
pretty much similar actually. except on client-side, you have src and dist folders. when you run "npm run build" vite will compile the src dir into dist dir. the outputs are the static files that you can serve with any http server such as npx serve, or caddy, or anything really.
> What gives? And finally, what exactly does "browserify" do these days, since I think Node supports both ES modules and and CJS modules? I also see sometimes UMD universal modules
vite supports both ecmascript modules and commonjs modules. but these days you'll just want to stick with ecmascript which makes your code consistently use import and export syntax, and you get the extra benefit of it working well with your vscode intellisense.
> In short, I'm a bit confused how to use package management properly with browsers in 2024: https://modern-web.dev/guides/going-buildless/es-modules/
if people want plain js there is unpkg.com and esm.sh way, but the vite route is the best for you as it's recommended and tested by the providers of your modules.
> And finally, if you answer this, can you spare a word about typescript? Do we still need to use Babel and Webpack together to transpile it to JS, and minify and tree-shake, or what?
I recommend typescript, as it gives you better type-safety and better intellisense, but it really depends. If you're new to it, it can slow you down at first. But as your project grows you'll eventually see the value of it. In vite there are options to scaffold your project in pure js or ts.
-
Deploy a react projects that are inside a subdirectories to GitHub Pages using GitHub Actions (CI/CD)
First you have to know that all those react projects are created using Vite, and for each of them, you need change the vite.config.ts file by adding the following configuration:
-
CSS Hooks and the state of CSS-in-JS
CSSHooks works with React, Prereact, Solid.js, and Qwik, and we’re going to use Vite with the React configuration. First, let's create a project called css-hooks and install Vite:
-
Collab Lab #66 Recap
JavaScript React Flowbite Tailwind Firebase - Auth, Database, and Hosting Vite
-
Use React.js with Laravel. Build a Tasklist app
For this full-stack single-page app, you'll use Vite.js as your frontend build tool and the react-beautiful-dnd package for draggable items.
What are some alternatives?
swc - Rust-based platform for the Web
Next.js - The React Framework
ts-node - TypeScript execution and REPL for node.js
parcel - The zero configuration build tool for the web. 📦🚀
esbuild - An extremely fast bundler for the web
fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin - Webpack plugin that runs typescript type checker on a separate process.
swc-node - Faster ts-node without typecheck
astro - The web framework for content-driven websites. ⭐️ Star to support our work!
TypeScript - TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
Rollup - Next-generation ES module bundler