styled-components VS styletron

Compare styled-components vs styletron and see what are their differences.


Visual primitives for the component age. Use the best bits of ES6 and CSS to style your apps without stress 💅 (by styled-components)


:zap: Toolkit for component-oriented styling (by styletron)
Our great sponsors
  • Appwrite - The Open Source Firebase alternative introduces iOS support
  • Scout APM - Less time debugging, more time building
  • SonarQube - Static code analysis for 29 languages.
styled-components styletron
137 5
36,578 3,260
0.9% 0.3%
7.5 1.9
15 days ago about 1 month ago
TypeScript JavaScript
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.


Posts with mentions or reviews of styled-components. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-05-19.


Posts with mentions or reviews of styletron. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-12-09.
  • A recruiter asked me this.
    1 project | | 3 Mar 2022
    React is pretty much its own language at this point. With J/TSX. Not even CSS is immune to react's approach of "what everything was proprammatically generated divs?", case and point
  • Tailwind CSS v3
    9 projects | | 9 Dec 2021
    Some technical thoughts as someone who could care less about fanboyism:

    - One point where atomic CSS frameworks are supposed to shine over conventional CSS is bundle size, since they (at least the good ones) compile to only a single rule for any used value, rather than potentially repeating rules for semantically different classes.

    - Another point where atomic CSS frameworks shine is just sheer volume of banging code out. When the bulk of your output is visual, mastering tools based on shorthands like tailwind, emmet, etc can feel very productive.

    - Purely atomic CSS frameworks can make some workflows more difficult, e.g. by having too granular call sites and not allowing "let's see what happens to the overall theme if I do this design change" iterative style of work, or because workflows that edit CSS on the fly via browser devtools can no longer be used to limit impact within semantic lines (e.g. "I want to change padding only on buttons, without breaking everything else that happens to depend on the same padding value"). There are both design-oriented and debugging-oriented workflows that are affected in similar ways.

    - You generally don't get visual regressions at a distance w/ atomic CSS. This matters at organizations where desire for pixel precision and simultaneously fickle design teams are the norm. But conversely, "can we just change the font size to be a bit bigger across the site" can often run into issues of missed spots. On a similar note, designs may become inconsistent across a site over time due to the hyper local nature of atomic CSS oriented development.

    - Custom rules may as well be written in APL[0]; they usually aren't documented and it takes a "you-gotta-know-them-to-know-them" sort of familiarity to be able to work with them (or get back to them after a while).

    - There are some tools that mix and match atomic CSS with other paradigms. For example, styletron[0] can output atomic CSS for the bundling benefits, but looks like React styled components from a devexp perspective, and has rendering modes that output traditional-looking debug classes for chrome devtool oriented workflows.

    The main theme to be aware of: proponents rarely talk of maintenance, so beware of honeymoon effect. Detractors often omit that traditional CSS (especially at scale) also requires a lot of diligence to maintain. So think about maintenance and how AOP[1] vs hyperlocal development workflows interact with your organization's design culture.



  • 5 React.js UI Component libraries.
    9 projects | | 11 Aug 2021
    It is created, managed, and utilized by Uber. It includes a wide range of attractive components, with accessibility as the top focus. It is quick since it is built with the Styletron engine. Style overrides can be used to tweak themes, but in my experience, I've never required them because the design vibe they're trying for is precisely what I want.
  • Just-In-Time: The Next Generation of Tailwind CSS
    4 projects | | 15 Mar 2021
    [0] [1]
  • @blocz/react-responsive v3 is out
    3 projects | | 12 Mar 2021
    When we created the library, we were using styletron for our styles, and we wanted to bind the breakpoints we defined in @blocz/react-responsive with the breakpoints used for our styles.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing styled-components and styletron you can also consider the following projects:

styled-jsx - Full CSS support for JSX without compromises

emotion - 👩‍🎤 CSS-in-JS library designed for high performance style composition

chakra-ui - ⚡️ Simple, Modular & Accessible UI Components for your React Applications

JSS - JSS is an authoring tool for CSS which uses JavaScript as a host language.

PostCSS - Transforming styles with JS plugins

material-ui - MUI Core (formerly Material-UI) is the React UI library you always wanted. Follow your own design system, or start with Material Design.

Aphrodite - Framework-agnostic CSS-in-JS with support for server-side rendering, browser prefixing, and minimum CSS generation

react-bootstrap - Bootstrap components built with React

Fela - State-Driven Styling in JavaScript

React CSS Modules - Seamless mapping of class names to CSS modules inside of React components.

linaria - Zero-runtime CSS in JS library