mop VS CK-MQTT

Compare mop vs CK-MQTT and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
mop CK-MQTT
2 1
163 4
2.5% -
6.9 8.5
4 days ago about 2 months ago
Java C#
Apache License 2.0 MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

mop

Posts with mentions or reviews of mop. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-11-10.
  • Improving Developer Productivity at Disney with Serverless and Open Source
    6 projects | /r/java | 10 Nov 2022
    While Pulsar has its own protocol that handles streaming, queues, and a lot of the other features (distributed transactions, functions, etc.), it can also speak other messaging protocols via plug-ins. Looking around, the ones that appear to be actively developed are MQTT, Kafka (so your existing applications that use Kafka can also use Pulsar), AMQP, and JMS.
  • Mosquitto: An open-source MQTT broker
    16 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 29 Sep 2021
    If you need a highly available broker you can consider https://github.com/streamnative/mop which adds a MQTT protocol handler to Apache Pulsar.

    I recently contributed auth support and TLS support also just landed.

CK-MQTT

Posts with mentions or reviews of CK-MQTT. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-09-29.
  • Mosquitto: An open-source MQTT broker
    16 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 29 Sep 2021
    Now if you implemented your mqtt with an i++, this where you can start to have dataloss, because now that you sent 65k messages you finished you start to need actually free packet id.

    And it cause a lot more issues that what I said there, that I hope I covered every case in my implementation: https://github.com/signature-opensource/CK-MQTT/blob/develop...

    Then, this is just the PacketID Logic.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing mop and CK-MQTT you can also consider the following projects:

emqx - The most scalable open-source MQTT broker for IoT, IIoT, and connected vehicles

mosquitto - Eclipse Mosquitto - An open source MQTT broker

kop - Kafka-on-Pulsar - A protocol handler that brings native Kafka protocol to Apache Pulsar

NATS - High-Performance server for NATS.io, the cloud and edge native messaging system.

hivemq-community-edition - HiveMQ CE is a Java-based open source MQTT broker that fully supports MQTT 3.x and MQTT 5. It is the foundation of the HiveMQ Enterprise Connectivity and Messaging Platform

Node RED - Low-code programming for event-driven applications

zigbee2mqtt - Zigbee 🐝 to MQTT bridge 🌉, get rid of your proprietary Zigbee bridges 🔨

RabbitMQ - Open source RabbitMQ: core server and tier 1 (built-in) plugins

Aedes - Barebone MQTT broker that can run on any stream server, the node way