stable.art VS auto-sd-paint-ext

I am using Stable.Art and A1111 to integrate Stable Diffusion into Photoshop, I have followed the guides to the best of my abilities, modified the BAT file

Also this one: https://github.com/isekaidev/stable.art

I use this two: https://github.com/isekaidev/stable.art and https://github.com/AbdullahAlfaraj/Auto-Photoshop-StableDiffusion-Plugin

I haven't tried it, but there's also this in case you haven't either: https://github.com/isekaidev/stable.art

depends on what you are trying to to do, if it's just some light inpainting and img2img I personally use this plugin: https://github.com/isekaidev/stable.art

I'd recommend Stable.art, more intuitive/simple UI but you still get to choose models/VAE's since it connects with what WebUI loaded.

Looks like stable.art to me, similar menus at least. Maybe look into that?

It was unique a great tool when It first came out. But Now I use OpenOutpaint extension for A1111 - https://github.com/zero01101/openOutpaint/wiki/Manual It a bit less comfortable to use, bit I can use it in A1111 and it's a plus. I also tried the StableART extension for Photohop - https://github.com/isekaidev/stable.art , I like the forkflow cuz it's in Photoshop and I am used to it interface and tools, it even forced me to upgrade my PS to latest one, but somewhy it generates worse quality images that A1111 and openOutpaint, and it has only basic A1111 functions. But I used it only for couple days, need to comapre more. :-)

But if you really hate CC, try stable-art, get the .ccx and install it manually by extracting it in PS plug-in folder.

It makes more sense to embed stable diffusion capabilities into well-established image editors such as Gimp, Photoshop, Krita, or Figma, which come with layered, non-destructive functionalities, rather than attempting the opposite approach.

https://github.com/Interpause/auto-sd-paint-ext

You might be interested in knowing that Krita has a SD plug in that I've found works quite well if you're willing and able to install and run SD locally. Krita is now my primary art program. https://github.com/Interpause/auto-sd-paint-ext

GitHub - Interpause/auto-sd-paint-ext: Extension for AUTOMATIC1111 to add custom backend API for Krita Plugin & more

Yep, Krita has a SD plugin too ( https://github.com/Interpause/auto-sd-paint-ext ) but probably not as good as this Photoshop one yet.

Again in my humble opinion, however, it's nice to be able to choose (at least if you're willing to pay the subscription costs) among different models and algorithms. Use whatever suits best your needs or your ideas. I personally prefer SD's versatility, and the workflows enabled by "being able to get my hands on all the parameters", like sampler selection, CFG scale, inpainting and other stuff (have you tried InvokeAI's unified canvas or Automatic1111's Krita plugin?). Not to mention the ability to do progressive and potentially infinite upscaling of an image (Automatic1111's "SD upscale" script or InvokeAI's "Embiggen").

I have a simple question that apparently i cant seem to figure out for the past like 12 hours, im using the https://github.com/Interpause/auto-sd-paint-ext auto extension for the krita plugin, and im simply just trying to inpaint creatures and just general things into a scene, but no matter what i do, the result is nothing like it, i followed the inpainting tutorial they have listed on github (New layer from visible) then make a new layer to paint the mask on, tried all fill methods with different steps, im fairly new to all of this and what not, im using a custom model checkpoint btw if that matters (protogen 5.8)