solidity-underhanded-contest VS monorepo

Compare solidity-underhanded-contest vs monorepo and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
solidity-underhanded-contest monorepo
4 3
153 113
4.6% 0.9%
0.0 0.0
almost 2 years ago 9 months ago
Solidity Solidity
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

solidity-underhanded-contest

Posts with mentions or reviews of solidity-underhanded-contest. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-08-02.

monorepo

Posts with mentions or reviews of monorepo. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-08-02.
  • Nomad drained of $150m due to a coding mistake
    6 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 2 Aug 2022
    > tl;dr a routine upgrade marked the zero hash as a valid root, which had the effect of allowing messages to be spoofed on Nomad. Attackers abused this to copy/paste transactions and quickly drained the bridge in a frenzied free-for-all

    From this explainer:

    > It’s [Nomad is] built to address security first The Nomad team has been building secure bridges as a team for 4+ years and has studied the pitfalls of multi-sig and validator-based bridges.

    https://medium.com/imperator-guide/nomad-a-cross-chain-inter...

    Assuming this is true, and assuming the team is not incompetent or composed of the typical grifters, perhaps it's time to draw the inevitable conclusion. No amount of experience is sufficient to safeguard an Ethereum protocol of any interesting complexity.

    It's a reasonable question to ask, WTF is Nomad for? After all, isn't Ethereum supposed to be the World Computer, Turing complete and ready for any task? Nope. Never was.

    I think a good chunk of the answer can be found on the home page:

    > Nomad reduces gas fees by a factor of 10x relative to traditional header relay systems, while remaining decentralized.

    https://www.nomad.xyz

    That world computer is bogged down. The proliferation of chains is the response. Each one is less secure than the parent. Stuff like Nomad is the "connective tissue" to get the various organs of this science project talking to each other.

    Dive deeply enough down and you find the root of it all: everybody wants to make the next Bitcoin, Ethereum, and so on. With each turn of the crank a new crop of Barnums springs up to take the money of an unending supply of digital rubes.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing solidity-underhanded-contest and monorepo you can also consider the following projects:

ioccc-obfuscated-c-contest - IOCCC International Obfuscated C code contest entries

consensus-specs - Ethereum Proof-of-Stake Consensus Specifications

blog - Jeff Schnitzer's Blog

team - the Rust Community Team 🦀⚙️✨