solid-testing-library VS solid

A team and I built an NPM package that can be installed into any SolidJS application to help visualize your signals and how they communicate. I wanted to test if the components would render during the development stage. I found Solid’s testing library and proceeded to follow the steps.

With regards to third-party libraries, Solid does not have a lot yet, but it does have first-party libraries. Its first-party libraries are the equivalent of other popular libraries in other JavaScript libraries, such as Solid App Router for routing, Solid Testing Library for writing component tests, and Solid Transition Group for animations.

Well, you certainly could do that, but not even I'm suggesting you should, because components are usually used in a DOM context and not solely in a component context, as rendering could introduce side effects. Instead, I want to point you at Solid's testing library.

Solid Jest Solid Testing Library Storybook Example

The reactivity core, which is in https://github.com/solidjs/solid This is where you'll see the reactivity runtime implementation. Take note that Solid's reactivity doesn't rely on compile-time magic

I did try this but I'm not sure what you mean with the ssrLoadFrom. Is there any documentation on this, all I could find was the examples folder in solidjs: solid-ssr?

This is very true. I really hate svelte single file components. But then I tried JSX for breaking things down. I love solid but I don't feel really good about angle brackets within C style syntax. I saw this Scala library that stick with simple statically typed function syntax than html tags. I don't understand why people still wants to stick with xml like tags. In laminar markup is written like this scala div( h1("Hello world", color := "red"), inputCaption, input(inputMods, name := "fullName"), div( ">>", button("Submit"), "<<" ) ) I wish solid team makes their HyperScript syntax as performant as JSX.

What is Solid?

import logo from './logo.svg'; import styles from './App.module.css'; import 'flowbite'; function App() { return (

Edit src/App.jsx and save to reload.

Learn Solid, Tailwind CSS and Flowbite Toggle Flowbite modal

Terms of Service

svg> Close modal

With less than a month to go before the European Union enacts new consumer privacy laws for its citizens, companies around the world are updating their terms of service agreements to comply.

The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (G.D.P.R.) goes into effect on May 25 and is meant to ensure a common set of data rights in the European Union. It requires organizations to notify users as soon as possible of high-risk data breaches that could personally affect them.

I accept Decline

); } export default App;

There is example of each technique in Solid's main repo: https://github.com/solidjs/solid/tree/main/packages/solid-ssr/examples

I basically came up with an idea that is much like flutter's bloc pattern, and probably waht ryansolid was referring to in his reply to this issue when he said he made his own version of redux that codifies state changes instead of immutable state.

After seeing how inactive this sub was, I took it to Github: https://github.com/solidjs/solid/discussions/1440