shh
shellharden
| shh | shellharden | |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 16 | |
| 261 | 4,564 | |
| - | - | |
| 5.1 | 5.0 | |
| 5 months ago | about 2 months ago | |
| Haskell | Rust | |
| - | Mozilla Public License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
shh
-
Shh: Simple Shell Scripting from Haskell
shh is a really cool package, and so is turtle and shelly:
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/turtle/docs/Turtle-Tutor...
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/shelly
shh's "Alternatives" section summarises nicely some of the differences between these:
https://github.com/luke-clifton/shh#alternatives
shh has a neat [fmt| ... |] macro that gets you around escaping strings.
shh generally has more Template Haskell support; you may or may not like this.
I am personally leaning towards shh because of its "native pipe style".
- Shellcheck finds bugs in your shell scripts
-
What are the disadvantages of using an interactive shell based on a regular programming language (python, scheme's scsh, etc) vs. bourne shell and bash?
There exist hybrids, where general purpose languages are somehow coerced into shells by adding syntactic sugar or removing features. Xonsh and shh come to mind, respectively for Python and Haskell.
shellharden
-
Shellcheck finds bugs in your shell scripts
Everytime I see Shellcheck coming up, I have to mention shellharden[0] written by a colleague of mine. It is basically shellcheck but it applies the suggested changes automatically.
0: https://github.com/anordal/shellharden
-
similar to shellcheck?
Also worth mentioning shellharden
-
Bash Pitfalls
See also:
* https://www.shellcheck.net/ — linting tool to avoid common mistakes and improve your script
* Bash Practices: https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashGuide/Practices
* Bash Pitfalls: https://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashPitfalls
* safe ways to do things in bash: https://github.com/anordal/shellharden/blob/master/how_to_do...
* better scripting: https://robertmuth.blogspot.in/2012/08/better-bash-scripting...
* robust scripting: https://www.davidpashley.com/articles/writing-robust-shell-s...
-
Code formatter, linters, etc. Recommendations?
There is shellcheck, and shellharden which is a strict version of it. There are similar stuff here, some that also help with your editor. You can also use a docker version of shfmt. See here for a quick tutorial on shfmt.
-
What is best Method of Submitting Bash Script, short Python ignorance confession (lament.)
Regarding linters, there are several of them in most languages.For bash, there is Shellcheck or a more strict (and sometimes confusing) Shellharden to do exactly what you want.
-
Awesome Rewrite It In Rust - A curated list of replacements for existing software written in Rust
For example, shellharden looks awesome.
- anordal/shellharden Safe ways to do things in bash
- How to do things safely in Bash
- How to do things safely in Bash (2018)
What are some alternatives?
bach - Bach Testing Framework
ShellCheck - ShellCheck, a static analysis tool for shell scripts
fs_playground - F# Playground
shfmt - Dockernized shfmt. This formats shell script.
dagger - Application Delivery as Code that Runs Anywhere
shfmt - A shell formatter (sh/bash/mksh)
oil - Oils is our upgrade path from bash to a better language and runtime. It's also for Python and JavaScript users who avoid shell!
azure-policy - Repository for Azure Resource Policy built-in definitions and samples
shellcheck-gitlab-ci-scripts-hook
sh - A shell parser, formatter, and interpreter with bash support; includes shfmt
clutch - Run Swift scripts that depend on packages
rust_cmd_lib - Common rust command-line macros and utilities, to write shell-script like tasks in a clean, natural and rusty way