AoC_2022
aoc-2022-chatgpt
| AoC_2022 | aoc-2022-chatgpt | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 0 | 13 | |
| - | - | |
| 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| over 1 year ago | over 1 year ago | |
| Java | Python | |
| - | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
AoC_2022
-
I Taught ChatGPT to Invent a Language
I didn't have a problem with it... but its a "how do you get to the spot where its mostly bug fixing using ChatGPT and prompts?"
For that repo (not mine - mine is over at https://github.com/shagie/AoC_2022 ), day 5 is where they got to the point where the complexity of the description of the problem is greater than the complexity of the problem itself.
aoc-2022-chatgpt
-
Anyone else afraid of what ChatGPT’s ability to write code means for our industry?
Here is one such repository - https://github.com/ishan0102/aoc-2022-chatgpt
-
I Taught ChatGPT to Invent a Language
The advent of code problems have gotten beyond the "easy to solve" category. Days 5 and 6 have gotten more tricky.
https://github.com/ishan0102/aoc-2022-chatgpt
> Day 5: Supply Stacks
> This day actually threw me for a loop because parsing the input is so challenging. After spending a while on prompting I wasn't able to produce anything meaningful. I might actually stop after today if the puzzles keep getting harder because I don't want to spend all this time messing with input parsing. This highlights some of the limitations well, we still need human input to coax the model into understanding how to break down a hard problem.
- Show HN: Solving Advent-of-Code with ChatGPT
- ChatGPT's solutions to Advent of Code 2022
What are some alternatives?
Spring - Spring Framework