sectorforth
lo
sectorforth | lo | |
---|---|---|
10 | 64 | |
374 | 15,420 | |
- | - | |
0.0 | 5.8 | |
almost 2 years ago | 8 days ago | |
Assembly | Go | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
sectorforth
-
Cognition: The Revolutionary Antisyntax Language Redefining Metaprogramming
I think it's fine to show that you can do it, I think the main thing is to flip the order a bit.
E.g. "here's a cool thing thing we can do outcome of significantly changing a readable syntax>" to hook people, "here's how ", "and if you really want to know how to bootstrap this from basics ".
Maybe compare how e.g. Forth is often introduced, with how people describe bootstrapping of a simplistic Forth like Jonesforth or Sectorforth [2]. Showing people how they can define their own words and it fundamentally changes how they work with the language afterwards is cool to a lot of people who have no interest in details like how you an implement even numbers with a minimal set of primitives (e.g. Sectorforth relies on that).
Both are interesting to me, but I'm weird, and I think for most people it'd be easier to maintain their interest if those two aspects are either separate articles or at least if the bootstrapping is relegated to a standalone section they're clearly told they can skip.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31368212
[2] https://github.com/cesarblum/sectorforth
- Konilo: A personal computing system in Forth
-
Fourteen Years of Go
> I'm not sure here how you differentiate minimalist from restrictive.
The flexibility of the language and its syntax. The more constructs are syntactic, the less minimalistic it is, and Go is a very syntactic language.
> I've always considered Go to be minimalist in terms of available tokens to the programmer: https://github.com/e3b0c442/keywords/blob/main/chart.png
No language on this chart has even a passing resemblance to minimalistic. I don't think anything does when it reaches double digit keywords.
For reference, I believe Smalltalk has 6.
And forth is more complicated because it doesn't really have keywords at all, and barely any syntax, instead it has assembly-coded / runtime-provided words (~functions) and variables. SectorForth (https://github.com/cesarblum/sectorforth/) is down to 8 builtin words, 2 IO words, and 5 variables (milliforth packs those behind a word instead). And so far 2 of the words have been found unnecessary / redundant.
-
MilliForth
https://github.com/cesarblum/sectorforth/issues
-
Interesting Article About a C compiler in 512 bytes That Uses Forth Inspired Tricks to Fit an Extremely Tight Space Constraint
Probably well known, but I'll let it here anyway: SectorForth
- Ask HN: What are some impressive software projects that fit in 512 bytes?
-
That's pretty much it!
sectorforth
-
A Forth bootable by old 386 PCs?
If you want to go allll the way down to the metal, you could put https://github.com/cesarblum/sectorforth in a floppy boot sector and then work your way up from there, enabling line A20 and switching into 32-bit protected mode yourself. Certainly on the "DIY" end of the spectrum, but it sure would be satisfying.
-
suckless programming languages?
Forth - More powerful and minimal than C, can fit in 512 bytes
- BootOS operating system in 512 bytes
lo
-
Go 1.22 Release Notes
On the other hand, I advise you NOT to use this kind of library and write simple, fast go code most of the time, with the occasional generics helper. Why the hell would I clutter my code with, for example: https://github.com/samber/lo?tab=readme-ov-file#fromentries-...
-
Go is not an easy language (2021)
This wasn't feasable without generics, and now with generics they're already adding some convenience functions to the stdlib, like in the slices package.
For map, reduce etc it's not in the stdlib yet, but you can use https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/samber/lo
- I wrote a for loop so you don't have to. Parallel Map, Filter, Reduce library
-
What is your recommendation for a package beyond std?
In particular, I'd like recommend samber/lo, this is a lodash generic tool for golang.
-
What 3rd-party libraries do you use often/all the time?
What are some 3rd-party libraries for Go that you use often/all the time? Instead of "just implement everything yourself", I would really like to get some tips. For instance, a few days ago I discovered https://github.com/samber/lo , which looks very good if I want to have list comprehensions (Python) / LINQ methods (C#). https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/atotto/clipboard is also good for clipboard operations. What else do you suggest and for what task?
- Fourteen Years of Go
-
Functional Programming Library for Golang by IBM
A simple alternative is the combination of:
- https://github.com/samber/lo
- https://github.com/samber/mo
The split is also nice as you can choose to just use the generic convenience functions from lo without the more FP related things from mo.
- Khan Academy's switch from a Python 2 monolith to a services-oriented backend written in Go.
-
In what ways are channels are better than the traditional await?
Some packages offer utilities to gather results from goroutines, such as multierror.Group or parallel.Map in samber/lo.
-
samber/lo utility package based on generics
I came across samber/log a package based on generics for providing utility methods.
What are some alternatives?
sectorlisp - Bootstrapping LISP in a Boot Sector
underscore - 🌟 Useful functional programming helpers for Go
porth - It's like Forth but in Python
mo - 🦄 Monads and popular FP abstractions, powered by Go 1.18+ Generics (Option, Result, Either...)
book8088 - Examples from my book Programming Boot Sector Games
fpGo - Monad, Functional Programming features for Golang
colorForth - colorForth running in Bochs for Windows
go-godash - An experimental generic functional utility library inspired by Lodash
jonesforth - Mirror of JONESFORTH
fp-go - fp-go is a collection of Functional Programming helpers powered by Golang 1.18+ generics.
harm-less - Inspired by suckless and cat-v, this is a simple single document wiki of suckless practices and minimal software.
go-generic-optional - Implementation of Optionals in Go using Generics