scar VS spectator

Compare scar vs spectator and see what are their differences.

scar

A game engine written in Crystal using crsfml (by vypxl)

spectator

Feature-rich testing framework for Crystal inspired by RSpec. (by icy-arctic-fox)
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
scar spectator
1 1
26 96
- -
1.6 6.7
about 1 year ago 3 months ago
Crystal Crystal
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

scar

Posts with mentions or reviews of scar. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

spectator

Posts with mentions or reviews of spectator. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-02-01.
  • What are the downsides of Ruby ?
    3 projects | /r/ruby | 1 Feb 2022
    In that situation, if there was a performance critical component we wanted to optimize by rewriting in Crystal, we would first extract it into its own app or worker (aka breakup the monolith, aka micro-services). Additional apps could have requests routed to them via a reverse proxy or they could be internal HTTP-endpoints. Then we would port that code to Crystal, replacing gem dependencies with Crystal shards equivalents (which there are many, and more are being added everyday), and then running the Ruby code through rubycodemod_crystal which changes minor things (ex: include? -> includes? or require 'foo' -> require "foo"). Assuming this component has RSpec tests, I would convert them to Spectator which is a Crystal clone of RSpec. Then I would tighten up the Crystal code by adding explicit Types to all instance variables and method signatures, so the compiler doesn't have to infer the types. This is basically the same process I have done when porting some of my own Ruby libraries to Crystal.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing scar and spectator you can also consider the following projects:

crystal - The Crystal Programming Language

selenium.cr - Selenium library for Crystal

duktape.cr - Evaluate JavaScript from Crystal!

spec - Common/helpful Spec compliant testing utilities

schedule.cr - :clock3: Run periodic tasks in Crystal

spec-kemal - Easy testing for Kemal

crest - HTTP and REST client for Crystal

minitest.cr - Test Unit for the Crystal programming language

mosquito - A background task runner for crystal applications supporting periodic (CRON) and manually queued jobs