rpp-backup VS crater

Thank you. Yes, it's Pokemon Red + +

Pokemon Red plus plus

The full list of features can be found here https://github.com/JustRegularLuna/rpp-backup/blob/master/FEATURES.md

Pokemon Red++ Like Red DX but even more modernized. Attempts to update the Gen 1 engine with Gen 6 mechanics and design philosophy. In addition, a lot of bugfixes have been performed on the gen 1 engine.

red++ for gen 1

GitHub link

You may also be interested in Red ++ (version 3).

Date of last update: 3 months ago https://github.com/JustRegularLuna/rpp-backup

Tonight I'm playing Pokemon Red++, a romhack of Pokemon Red. It introduces numerous improvements over Red, including the ability to catch all 151 Pokemon on a single cartridge, the addition of several Pokemon from Gen 2 onwards, and a billion quality-of-life enhancements.

yup, they reference it as an inspiration: https://github.com/rust-lang/crater

it's probably impossible to automate an entire ecosystem, and there is value to enabling a tighter integration within a project ecosystem (a subset of the language ecosystem).

Rather than hypothesising about an imagined tool you could look at the actual tool which of course is in Rust's source code repo: https://github.com/rust-lang/crater

> new proposed C++ changes - are checked against only easily and "well-known" accessible package.

Now that I have, so to say, shown you mine, lets see yours. Where is the tool to perform these checks in C++?

The "break things" part of "move fast" is not essential, Rust cares so much about breakage they literally compile and run the tests for every crate on crates.io and github using a tool called Crater. They do this just to test changes, even for stuff thats documented to be unstable, because thats just courtesy. And tooling makes it trivial to switch between Rust versions.

The bot's named Crater if you want to look into it more.

See https://github.com/rust-lang/crater

Rust compiler developers use a tool called Crater to test potentially breaking compiler changes on all crates (Rust's name for libraries) uploaded to the official repository. If plugin stability is the issue, maybe a solution along these lines would be better than merging these plugins to Neovim's core?

https://github.com/rust-lang/crater is the bot they use to test proposed compiler/stdlib changes against slices of the crates.io library up to and including "all of it".

The tool you're referring to is called Crater: https://github.com/rust-lang/crater.

I'm pretty certain this isn't actually true. You should look at the editions, etc. Rust also has an insane guarantee which I am certain C/C++ don't offer: It rebuilds its entire library ecosystem each time it ships to make sure nothing breaks (https://crater.rust-lang.org). I've never seen an instance were old code didn't compile on a new compiler. Rust isn't forwards compatible (new code compiles on an old compiler) of course, but what is?