rhombus-prototype
Brainstorming and draft proposals for Rhombus (by racket)
racket-mode
Emacs major and minor modes for Racket: edit, REPL, check-syntax, debug, profile, and more. (by greghendershott)
| rhombus-prototype | racket-mode | |
|---|---|---|
| 24 | 3 | |
| 299 | 678 | |
| 0.7% | - | |
| 9.7 | 8.5 | |
| 1 day ago | 14 days ago | |
| Racket | Racket | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
rhombus-prototype
Posts with mentions or reviews of rhombus-prototype.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-26.
-
Why does Racket have Type-Maps instead of Just a Single Map?
See related post. The dot operator in Rhombus will allow a function call like expr.map(…) to be statically specialized to Some.map(expr, …) provided that expr carries sufficient static information. This isn’t possible in Racket given the lack of static information in general.
- State of Rhombus
-
Rhombus-in-the-rough: A 2D RPG implemented in the Rhombus Racket dialect
If you want to know more the best starting point is https://github.com/racket/rhombus-prototype They have discussion on the GitHub repo
-
Multiple namespaces?
Racket has the concept of binding space built on top of the scope-set model. The experiment language Rhombus makes heavy use of this for contextual bindings. Note that bindings are used for language extensions among other purposes in Racket.
-
Generalized and first-class macros: what is this called?
The notion of “tail sequence” in general doesn’t exist in Lisp’s macro-expansion model, since Lisp macros are strictly local transformations. A “tail sequence” allows a macro to control the expansion of the whole context, which requires wrapping the whole context in another macro in Lisp’s model. This is what leads to proposals like #%local-definition in Racket. However, this notion does exist in the enforestation model, which is what the experiment language Rhombus is based on, although it’s probably not quite a Lisp ;)
- Lang Rhombus
-
Anyone else concerned that Rhombus/Racket2 is not a lisp based language?
Rhombus is: - just another #lang. It is built on top of the existing Racket VM and written in Racket. It interoperates with existing Racket code and uses the Racket expander. - macro extendable. Hygiene and all of the good stuff work. - being developed in the open. We meet biweekly over Zoom, and discussions also occur in GitHub Discussions.
- Anyone aware of Racket projects that are in need of contributors? I am experienced in PL design and have two months worth of spare time. I have never contributed to an opensource project before besides taureg.
-
Racket->Rhombus: To Sexp or not to Sexp?
Querying Git references for rhombus-prototype at https://github.com/racket/rhombus-prototype.git Using cached16617263581661726358301 for https://github.com/racket/rhombus-prototype.git DrRacket install: version mismatch for dependency for package: https://github.com/racket/rhombus-prototype.git mismatch packages: base (have 8.6, need 8.6.0.9)
Instead of hoping, you might consider reading the discussions to see what the developers are actually saying. Just a thought.
racket-mode
Posts with mentions or reviews of racket-mode.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-10-07.
-
Anyone aware of Racket projects that are in need of contributors? I am experienced in PL design and have two months worth of spare time. I have never contributed to an opensource project before besides taureg.
Racket Mode: https://github.com/greghendershott/racket-mode
-
Does any major mode of Emacs support other #langs
Which is what the branch does. See the minor mode racket-hash-lang-mode.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing rhombus-prototype and racket-mode you can also consider the following projects:
swi-mqtt-pack - MQTT pack for SWI-Prolog
racket-langserver
SmalltalkVimMode - Vim Mode for Playground, System Browser, Debugger in Pharo.
resyntax - A Racket refactoring engine
gerbil - Gerbil Scheme
qi - A general-purpose functional DSL.
sham - A DSL for runtime code generation in racket
racketscript - Racket to JavaScript Compiler
conjure - Interactive evaluation for Neovim (Clojure, Fennel, Janet, Racket, Hy, MIT Scheme, Guile, Python and more!)
parless - A DrRacket plugin to streamline how code appears in the editor
inspector - Turn Clojure specs into clj-kondo type annotations
racket-review - A linter for Racket.
rhombus-prototype vs swi-mqtt-pack
racket-mode vs racket-langserver
rhombus-prototype vs SmalltalkVimMode
racket-mode vs resyntax
rhombus-prototype vs gerbil
racket-mode vs qi
rhombus-prototype vs sham
racket-mode vs racketscript
rhombus-prototype vs conjure
racket-mode vs parless
rhombus-prototype vs inspector
racket-mode vs racket-review