rewrite VS Guava

If you're into this sort of thing, there's OpenRewrite[1] for the Java ecosystem.

[1] https://docs.openrewrite.org/

> Spring has gotten so bloated.

I'd call Spring feature-rich than bloated. You can always shed weight that you don't want to carry.

> Plus there's multiple ways of doing the same thing. e.g. JPA, spring-data.

That's because there are different ways to solve a problem. Someone may want an ORM-based approach to connect to the database; they can choose spring-data-jpa. Someone may want to use JDBC with a light abstraction on top of it; they can choose spring-data-jdbc. It's all about choices and right tradeoffs and Spring offers plenty of them.

> they don't provide easy upgrade paths between majors versions

That's not my experience. I've been happily upgrading 2.x.x versions and plan to upgrade to 3.2.x when it is ready. But depending on the codebase, I admit it can be painful. Projects like OpenRewrite[1] might help here.

> and they stop updating vulnerabilities on older major versions.

This is not news. They want you to pay for extended support if you need it.

> No docs on migration.

They do maintain migration docs on GitHub wiki which are a lot more detailed than their blog posts on migration. Here's the latest one to upgrade from Spring Boot 2 to 3: https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-boot/wiki/Spring-B...

[1]: https://github.com/openrewrite/rewrite

The issue you may run into when migrating from Spring Boot 2.x to 3.x is the JEE namespace renames. Migrating code from 8 to 17 in my experience hasn't been all that difficult. In most projects, there are no changes to make. However, with the namespace change, you'll probably have to do some planning and testing. If you are migrating a lot of projects, check out Open Rewrite, it may help automate a lot of these upgrades (for both 8 to 17 and Spring Boot versions).

Couldn't OpenRewrite (https://docs.openrewrite.org) do a big part of this manual work?

Openrewrite would probably be a big help, see https://docs.openrewrite.org

In a similar vein there is OpenRewrite which is an open-source project that works in a similar way. It also has a lot of great refactorings already built in, like doing all the grunt work for migrating to JUnit 5, or replacing string concatenation in SLF4J log calls with parameterized formatting.

seems a case for https://docs.openrewrite.org/

https://github.com/openrewrite/rewrite might help

The first problem is at the level of Type System, given that a situation more correct would allow us to distinguish through the Collection Type which abstraction we are operating with, species if definable as mutable or immutable. The JCF was born at a time when great care was taken to offer immediate operational data structures, and with attention to performance, but with less attention to constructs or uses that are now seen as common. These concepts have been taken up by other infrastructures from which we certainly cannot fail to mention: Eclipse Collection, Guava Collections, and VAVR.

Even better is getting Gradle/Maven to correctly pull "plain" vs "Android" versions of the package instead of them just publishing the diverging code base as two repository packages.

https://github.com/google/guava/issues/2914

I'll admit I'm surprised to see that BOMs have been documented on maven.apache.org since mid-2008. It looks like Spring, for example, didn't adopt them until mid-2014. I don't know how widely they caught on in other areas. The first discussion of them in the context of Guava may have been in 2018, as I don't see mention of them in the various issues from 2011-2015 (#605, #1329, #1471, #1954.

And a quick peek at the source code for ImmutableList seems to confirm this (https://github.com/google/guava/blob/master/guava/src/com/google/common/collect/ImmutableList.java - it goes via a bunch of methods, but ends up using Arrays.copyOf(), which creates a fixed-size array).

The guava library of Java has some of these data structures implemented: https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/ImmutableCollectionsExplained , but implementations of the above book in many languages can be found on github (say, this one for Haskell: https://github.com/aistrate/Okasaki )

Java Mask: Java Mask is a library that offers various string masking techniques for sensitive data such as credit card numbers, email addresses, and more. You can find the library at: https://github.com/miguelfreitas93/java-mask DataMasker: DataMasker is a Java library specifically designed for masking sensitive data, including credit card numbers, using customizable masking patterns. Visit the GitHub repository for more information and usage examples: https://github.com/GDSSecurity/DataMasker Maskify: Maskify is a simple Java library that can be used to mask credit card numbers, Social Security numbers, and other sensitive information. You can find the library at: https://github.com/jonathancarvalhoalves/maskify CreditCardUtils: This is a lightweight Java library that provides utility methods for validating, formatting, and masking credit card numbers. Visit the GitHub repository for more information: https://github.com/malkusch/creditcardutils Google Guava: Google Guava is a popular set of Java libraries containing a wealth of utilities for working with strings, collections, and more. While not specifically designed for masking credit card information, you can use Guava's string manipulation methods to mask sensitive data: https://github.com/google/guava

I mean, I guess, technically? If you define it like that, then Microsoft has people working for them for free, as does Google, as does Apple, etc. It's not that weird, and you can try to twist it to be weird, but those of us in the software industry largely regard this as a good thing.

So we have https://github.com/google/guava/issues/4011

Ok, so let's implement our lazy initialization more smartly to avoid acquiring the lock every time and use old fashion but still working double-checked locking. I've found it implemented by Suppliers.memoize in guava library.