return-optics
Performance-Analysis-JS
Our great sponsors
return-optics | Performance-Analysis-JS | |
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
13 | 603 | |
- | - | |
10.0 | 10.0 | |
over 6 years ago | over 5 years ago | |
Elm | JavaScript | |
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
return-optics
-
Solid.js feels like what I always wanted React to be
Yeah? I wrote something to deal with it too (https://github.com/toastal/return-optics) 5.5 years ago. You arguably chose the wrong data as `(model, Cmd msg, Maybe extMsg)` instead of `(model, Cmd msg, List extMsg)` which would give you more flexibility and still functions as a monoid on [] instead of Nothing, but allows multiple messages shrug. I tried this approach more recently and it involved me having to encode all of actions in a massive tree and then I still had issues with certain messages including now having to UUID all elements that that previously I didn't need to think about. It was a mess, but the best I could do with the tools at hand.
If you compare this to Halogen (https://github.com/purescript-halogen/purescript-halogen/blo...) where you still have purity but can set up subscribers and listeners from any component. It's much easier to use and for some components like dialogs, it's much simpler. And this actually isn't the best example because with the latest Halogen, Portals (https://github.com/purescript-halogen/purescript-halogen/pul...) was introduced so you can launch a dialog on the spot instead of even needing to communicate between them at all.
Performance-Analysis-JS
-
In my 2 years of JavaScript I never knew you could label `for` loop at all?
Using a for loop will be more efficient because the construct doesn’t invoke a callback. Here’s one example but most jsperf searches will say the same thing.
-
Solid.js feels like what I always wanted React to be
https://github.com/dg92/Performance-Analysis-JS
The problem with JS is that the execution model is so nebulous, that performance advice basically boils down to - trust in Google.
What are some alternatives?
solid-docs - Cumulative documentation for SolidJS and related packages.
Cycle.js - A functional and reactive JavaScript framework for predictable code
Recoil - Recoil is an experimental state management library for React apps. It provides several capabilities that are difficult to achieve with React alone, while being compatible with the newest features of React.
react-solid-state - Auto tracking state management for modern React
htm - Hyperscript Tagged Markup: JSX alternative using standard tagged templates, with compiler support.
eslint-plugin-no-loops - It's 2024 and you still use loops?
solid-start - SolidStart, the Solid app framework