restQL-core-java VS Play WS

Compare restQL-core-java vs Play WS and see what are their differences.

restQL-core-java

Microservice query language (by b2wdigital)
Projects HTTP Clients

DISCONTINUED

Suggest alternative
Edit details

Play WS

Standalone Play WS, an async HTTP client with fluent API (by playframework)
Projects HTTP Clients Asynchttpclient Scala HTTP Client Java Asynchronous Reactive reactive-streams Playframework
Source Code
playframework.com
Suggest alternative
Edit details
InfluxDB
Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Our great sponsors
restQL-core-java Play WS
- 2
43 220
- 0.0%
0.0 8.2
over 2 years ago 7 days ago
Java Scala
MIT License Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

restQL-core-java

Posts with mentions or reviews of restQL-core-java. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning restQL-core-java yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

Play WS

Posts with mentions or reviews of Play WS. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-09-06.
  • Code in jar dependency is packed as java code and can not be used as normal Scala dependency
    1 project | /r/scala | 4 May 2022
    Take a look at https://github.com/playframework/play-ws build.sbt. it is a scala lib built with sbt-assembly to shade dependencies and avoid binary incompatibility. That is the only reason to build a lib with sbt-assembly.
  • Scala or Go: Who Wore It Better?
    7 projects | dev.to | 6 Sep 2021
    In this example, the code uses Play WS Standalone as a REST client to fetch JSON containing a UUID. Play WS has an asynchronous, non-blocking API based on Future, so you need to provide an ExecutionContext via Akka. That's all the boilerplate at the beginning of this example. Sometimes it will be done for you as when you use Play WS in the context of Play Framework. Nonetheless, you should be aware it has to happen somewhere.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing restQL-core-java and Play WS you can also consider the following projects:

unirest-java - Unirest in Java: Simplified, lightweight HTTP client library.

Armeria - Your go-to microservice framework for any situation, from the creator of Netty et al. You can build any type of microservice leveraging your favorite technologies, including gRPC, Thrift, Kotlin, Retrofit, Reactive Streams, Spring Boot and Dropwizard.

methanol - ⚗️ Lightweight HTTP extensions for Java

Google HTTP Client - Google HTTP Client Library for Java

Scala.js - Scala.js, the Scala to JavaScript compiler

kmq - Kafka-based message queue

Play - The Community Maintained High Velocity Web Framework For Java and Scala.

Akka - Build highly concurrent, distributed, and resilient message-driven applications on the JVM

restQL-core-java vs unirest-java Play WS vs unirest-java restQL-core-java vs Armeria Play WS vs methanol restQL-core-java vs methanol Play WS vs Armeria restQL-core-java vs Google HTTP Client Play WS vs Google HTTP Client Play WS vs Scala.js Play WS vs kmq Play WS vs Play Play WS vs Akka