refute
connect-es
refute | connect-es | |
---|---|---|
3 | 13 | |
9 | 1,211 | |
- | 1.8% | |
5.9 | 9.2 | |
7 months ago | 5 days ago | |
TypeScript | TypeScript | |
MIT License | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
refute
-
Ramda: A practical functional library for JavaScript programmers
I find straight forward, dedicated combinators much more readable and practical to use ie. for iterables (context where it makes a lot of sense) [0] example [1], runtime assertions (through refutations, which are much faster than combinators over assertions) [2], parser combinators for smallish grammars [3] etc.
In many cases vanilla/imperative js is more readable and terse, no need to bring functional fanaticism everywhere, just in places where it gives true benefits and in form that can be understood by peers.
Functional code can be beautiful and can also be unreadable/undebugable. Same with imperative code. It's great in js/ts you can pick approach where the problem is expressed more naturally and mix it at will.
[0] https://github.com/preludejs/generator
[1] https://observablehq.com/@mirek/project-euler
[2] https://github.com/preludejs/refute
[3] https://github.com/preludejs/parser
-
Ask HN: Why isn't JSON-RPC more widely adopted?
We use jsonrpc over websockets in production for many years in trading services. It works very well. We use lightweight libraries that look like this [0] and this [1]. It's lightweight, fast, type safe, easy to maintain and debug etc.
[0] https://github.com/preludejs/jsonrpc
[1] https://github.com/preludejs/refute
-
An Inconsistent Truth: Next.js and Typesafety
Types can be asserted at runtime (parsed) at IO boundaries (reading http request or response, websocket message, parsing json file etc). Once they enter statically type system they don't need to be asserted again.
The difference it makes is illusion of type-safety vs type-safety this article touches on.
You can try to bind service with client somehow but in many cases this will fail in production as you can't guarantee paired versioning, due to normal situations by design of your architecture or temporary mid-deployment state or other team doing something they were not suppose to do etc. It's hard to avoid runtime parsing in general.
Functional combinators [0] or faster [1] with predicate/assert semantics work very well with typescript, which is very pleasant language to work with.
[0] https://github.com/appliedblockchain/assert-combinators
[1] https://github.com/preludejs/refute
connect-es
-
I Reviewed 1,000s of Opinions on gRPC
> However, it's important to note that browser support wasn't a primary focus in gRPC's design. This oversight necessitates an additional component, grpc-web, for browser accessibility. Furthermore, external services often have specific needs like caching and load balancing, which are not directly catered to by gRPC. Adopting gRPC for external services might require bespoke solutions to support these features.
The article should mention the Connect protocol for web-based Protobuf messaging:
https://connectrpc.com/
-
Creating the Local First Stack
We can solve this with a service! Now there are many ways I could have started, but I decided to test out gRPC along the way. This was a mistake. I hoped for the best, but gRPC ended up not being a good choice for the web client. Why? you ask. The gRPC protocol works with all the bells and whistles of http when used server to server, but web clients are not as great. The Javascript client is dependent on http 2.0, and it requires a proxy like Envoy to work with a browser. What's more, I didn't love the structure of the generated web client. So through the process of working on this 'local first stack' I actually got sucked in to a big rabbit hole in making the rpc system work. I ended up going with Connect which is a tool that can create a service from a protobuf service definition, that also talks a simple http 1.1 protocol. What ultimately sold me on this solution as the best is that it also came with a very nice to use web client generation, and even plugs in to my favorite react http helper useQuery.
-
Leveraging Temporal for resilient remote procedure calls (RPC)
Our stack at Escape is written in multiple languages because each team has specific needs. We use TypeScript for its vibrant ecosystem, Python for cybersecurity research and Go for performance-sensitive tasks. To orchestrate cross-language task orchestration, we first developed a simple request-response protocol over HTTP, but it wasn't sustainable as the Escape codebase grew rapidly. We evaluated several technologies to replace our homegrown protocol, and two emerged as the most promising options: Connect and Temporal. The title gives it away, but the reason is far from obvious
- Connect RPC – A Better gRPC
-
Building a modern gRPC-powered microservice using Node.js, Typescript, and Connect
protobuf messages we’ll configure (@bufbuild/connect-es)
-
TypeScript type safety with GO
try https://github.com/bufbuild/connect-web
-
Ask HN: Why isn't JSON-RPC more widely adopted?
As for better gRPC-web, you might want to look into connect-web https://github.com/bufbuild/connect-web
- When to use gRPC vs GraphQL
-
Protobuf-ES: The Protocol Buffers TypeScript/JavaScript runtime we all deserve
They already have! Connect (https://github.com/bufbuild/connect-web) is what you're looking for, as it's grpc-web compatible.
-
Connect-Web: It's time for Protobuf/gRPC to be your first choice in the browser
Ye, fwiw there is an example code size comparison here:
https://github.com/bufbuild/connect-web/blob/main/packages/c...
I'm sure someone will chime in on the implementation details, but hopefully others can give it a try with their projects!
What are some alternatives?
assert-combinators - Functional assertion combinators.
protobuf-es - Protocol Buffers for ECMAScript. The only JavaScript Protobuf library that is fully-compliant with Protobuf conformance tests.
next-rpc - makes exported functions from API routes accessible in the browser. Just import your API function and call it anywhere you want.
grpc-web - gRPC for Web Clients
parser - String parser combinators
ts-proto - An idiomatic protobuf generator for TypeScript
sick - Streams of Independent Constant Keys
buf - The best way of working with Protocol Buffers.
gradual-typing-bib - A bibliography on Gradual Typing
fastify-autoroutes - fastest way to map directories to URLs in fastify
protoc-gen-validate - Protocol Buffer Validation - Being replaced by github.com/bufbuild/protovalidate
connect-go - Moved to https://github.com/connectrpc/connect-go