refiner
vale
| refiner | vale | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 46 | |
| 29 | 4,197 | |
| - | 1.5% | |
| 7.7 | 9.3 | |
| 4 days ago | 7 days ago | |
| TypeScript | Go | |
| MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
refiner
-
Grammarly editor writing service are malfunctioning
- Source: https://github.com/imankulov/refiner.
For me it works better than Grammarly.
vale
- Software Technical Writing: A Guidebook [pdf]
- Grammarly editor writing service are malfunctioning
- Vale.sh – A Linter for Prose
- Ask HN: Best tool to proof-read technical documentation?
- Val, a high-level systems programming language
-
Common Bugs in Writing
Vale is an OSS tool that you can use as a "prose linter" with many of these rules. You can also write your own rules. Together with a spellchecker its a good replacement for proprietary tools like grammarly.
- https://github.com/errata-ai/vale
-
Just Simply – Stop saying how simple things are in our docs
> Write in US English with US grammar. (Tested in British.yml.)
heh, that was funny but it turns out the file is a list of British words checked using Vale, which I just learned existed: https://github.com/errata-ai/vale#readme (MIT)
Also, another TIL is that the "e" version of gray is British https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/doc/.vale... I had previously erroneously assumed they were just one of those quirks of English (which, I guess is still true but it is less random than I thought)
-
Tools that enforce/promote corporate standards?
Off the top of my head, Vale and Acrolinx.
-
Over 60% of Writers Already Use AI in Their Writing Workflow
I have recently thought of feeding the suggestions from Vale (https://vale.sh/) into an LLM along with your writing. Currently I just simply ask an LLM to take what I wrote and put it into a more "active voice". I then manually edit my writing to make it more "active" if I choose -- I do not just publish LLM generated content unaltered.
Note: I did not ask an LLM for this comment.
-
What terminal apps are you using?
vale to spell check and enforce writing style on my articles
What are some alternatives?
ScribeAI - ChatGPT extension for VSCode.
proselint - A linter for prose.
ai-template - Mercury - Train your own custom GPT. Chat with any file, or website.
lsp-grammarly - lsp-mode ❤️ grammarly
vale-ls - :zap: An implementation of the Language Server Protocol (LSP) for the Vale command-line tool.
nvim-lspconfig - Quickstart configs for Nvim LSP
clevercli - ChatGPT powered CLI utilities. Easily add new prompt types in ~/.clevercli/
write-good - Naive linter for English prose
Lobe Chat - LobeChat is a open-source, extensible (Function Calling), high-performance chatbot framework.It supports one-click free deployment of your private ChatGPT/LLM web application.
markdownlint - Repository for the markdownlint-mdl-action Github Action
languagetool - Style and Grammar Checker for 25+ Languages
remark-lint - plugins to check (lint) markdown code style