really-simple-xml-parser VS Obsidian

Compare really-simple-xml-parser vs Obsidian and see what are their differences.

really-simple-xml-parser

A really simple xml parser in Haskell using Parsec (by ckkashyap)

Obsidian

Obsidian Language Repository (by svenssonjoel)
CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers
Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
coderabbit.ai
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
really-simple-xml-parser Obsidian
- 1
5 40
- -
0.0 0.0
over 5 years ago over 6 years ago
Haskell Haskell
LicenseRef-PublicDomain BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

really-simple-xml-parser

Posts with mentions or reviews of really-simple-xml-parser. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning really-simple-xml-parser yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

Obsidian

Posts with mentions or reviews of Obsidian. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-04-06.
  • Is there any hard evidence that functional programming is better?
    2 projects | /r/functionalprogramming | 6 Apr 2021
    It got them 11 votes up. I asked to actually make this argument and received -4. Both sides of the claim are false, the left witnessed by things like Copilot and Obsidian, the right by the criticism of the functional style by Jon Harrop. If this is what you mean by «that is the point most of the comments tried to make» then, well, they should try harder if intellectual honesty and integrity are sought at all.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing really-simple-xml-parser and Obsidian you can also consider the following projects:

fortran-src - Fortran parsing and static analysis infrastructure

copilot - A stream-based runtime-verification framework for generating hard real-time C code.

futhark - :boom::computer::boom: A data-parallel functional programming language

toml-parser - Haskell parser and printer for the TOML 1.0.0 file format

purescript - A strongly-typed language that compiles to JavaScript

bash

haskell-tools-ast - Developer tools for Haskell

hfmt - Format Haskell programs. Inspired by the gofmt utility.

pyfi

resin - Resin: high performance variable binder and ast manipulation lib

brittany - haskell source code formatter

alga

CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers
Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
coderabbit.ai
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured

Did you konow that Haskell is
the 22nd most popular programming language
based on number of metions?