react-chartjs-2 VS Tailwind CSS

Chart JS is a great choice for creating charts as it has multiple visualizations. There are different integrations for the JS frameworks, and we shall use react-chart-js-2 library for Next JS.

React Chartjs 2 - Visit react-chartjs-2.js.org for more information. React Chartjs 2 is a React wrapper for Chart.js, a popular JavaScript charting library. It provides an easy way to integrate Chart.js into your React applications, allowing you to create a variety of charts and graphs with the underlying features of Chart.js.

Website: react-chartjs-2 GitHub page

If you’ve heard of Chart.js, you might wonder what React-chartjs-2 is all about. Well, think of it as a handy tool for using Chart.js within your React projects. Chart.js is a JavaScript library that helps create various types of interactive charts using HTML5 Canvas.

React Charts js

I'm currently using chart-js react-chartjs-2 it's ok but just wondering what else people could recommend for speed of implementation.

An example of a Snowflake API request using JavaScript, React, and Chart.js. This example uses react-chartjs-2, a wrapper for Chart.js. Install the dependencies:

React ChartJs 2 is a wrapper for the Chart.js library, which is a Javascript chart library used to build chart components with the HTML5 canvas element. In addition, Chart.js features can be used in React ChartJs 2. To get the most out of React ChartJs 2, you need to be familiar with Chart.js docs.

In the frontend, we decided to display the analytics data via a graph using the react-chartjs-2 library. React-chartjs-2 is a React wrapper for chartjs, a popular charting library for JavaScript. This library is simple, beginner friendly, maintainable, and flexible. It has a large community of users and thorough documentation. This provides for quick execution with the library. We also implemented the dashboard UI flexibly, so that any historical data point could be selected and displayed as requirements change in the future.

Finally, for our front end, we’re going to be pairing Next.js with the great combination of TailwindCSS and shadcn/ui so we can focus on building the functionality of the app and let them handle making it look awesome!

You can use any frontend framework you want — react-based tooling, however, has a natural advantage as it models everything as a function of state, which can map 1:1 with the concept in Burr. In the demo app we use react, react-query, and tailwind, but we’ll be skipping over this largely (it is not central to the purpose of the post).

Tailwind CSS: A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom designs.

First, you need to make sure that you have a working Tailwind CSS project…

Tailwind CSS

With better CSS approaches like TailwindCSS and Vanilla Extract (which we're heavily using) it's much easier to maintain the UI and make sure it doesn't change unexpectedly. No more conflicting CSS classes, much less CSS specificity issues and much less CSS code in general.

This app was built with Svelte Kit, Tailwind CSS, and many other technologies. For a full rundown, please visit the GitHub repository

Unlike Tailwind, which has over 77,000 stars on GitHub, Mojo CSS has about 200 stars on GitHub. But the Mojo CSS documentation is fairly good and you can find most of the information you’ll need there.

JavaScript React Flowbite Tailwind Firebase - Auth, Database, and Hosting Vite

- Performance is a feature.

Another common interpretation of brutalism is aesthetic, reacting to overly complicated user interfaces by creating simpler, more direct ones. Tailwind CSS (https://tailwindcss.com), one of today's most popular CSS libraries, promotes this approach in its component examples. There's also a neat library I've seen recently called "Neobrutalism Components" for React that I like (https://neobrutalism-components.vercel.app), providing components with a similar look and feel to Gumroad. This might more accurately be called 'Neo-Brutalism,' as noted in the comments.

A more engineering-centric interpretation of Brutalism focuses on form, structure, and efficiency, drawing significantly from brutalist architecture principles. Apart from the user interface itself, most mobile, desktop, and web applications are extremely bloated and often perform worse than sites from 10 years ago did. While one HTML file might be "less brutalist" than the original HN site, it is substantially more brutalist than any HN mobile app in existence, and offers nearly identical functionality.

A broader interpretation of brutalism, which could be termed 'Meta-Brutalism,' is embodied in the overall experience on this site through UX flows. Yes, in the strictest sense, the original HN site is more Brutalist in many ways, but it only shows 30 articles at a time and does not function as a PWA. For this site, the experience of reading 10 stories is arguably less brutalist, but for quickly browsing through several pages and skimming articles (which is how I read HN) it is a lot faster, and in my opinion, more Brutalist.

My primary inspiration was addressing software and tool bloat in UIs rather than strictly adhering to every principle set forth by David Bryant Copeland. I don't find it convincing that this site "isn't brutalist" compared to really any other experience apart from the Main HN site, and I would argue the overall experience is more brutalist in its performance and scrolling behavior.

As a side note: I generally don't like Brutalist architecture that much although I believe it is unfairly maligned. I visited the Salk Institute once and enjoyed it though (https://www.archdaily.com/61288/ad-classics-salk-institute-l...).