reMarkableWeb VS cal.com

There's a web-app (https://remarkable-web.vercel.app) which allows you to export highlighted text. It is useful but not perfect. For some weeks (or months) it disappeared. I just ask for an official, reliable, way of doing something most 30$ ebooks can do.

I am currently reading many books and papers and use highlighting a lot. My life would be a lot better if I could automatically extract the highlighted text. I tried several (by now outdated) solutions like Biff (https://github.com/soulisalmed/biff ), RCU and https://remarkable-web.vercel.app/ . The first two are apparently outdated, and the last I can't connect to (and all my files are >4 MB, so manual select doesn't work).

Since I discovered this app (https://remarkable-web.vercel.app/), I've been using it to extract some highlights.

I'm still on 2.15 and my work relies on https://remarkable-web.vercel.app/ to extract highlights from PDFs I mark up. Seems like reMarkable's updates have broken the directory browsing feature there, but I can still upload reMarkable PDFs manually and get my highlights.

They also have appeared to change the web api such that it has broken https://remarkable-web.vercel.app/.

I can't export any annotated pdfs since the beta installed. With the desktop app or the remarkable itself. Also https://remarkable-web.vercel.app/ seems to not work with the beta. So far the beta has completely broken the pdf annotation workflow as well as problemitizing reading pdfs.

Digest -- that also extracts all your highlights and notes for easy review. Here a workaround is to use https://remarkable-web.vercel.app for extracting highlights, and inserting blank pages in pdfs for more extensive notes.

However, recently, I discovered a non-hack app that allows me to extract my highlights, export them as a Markdown file (there's the possibility to connect Readwise) and use them in Obsidian.

Standard recognisable highlights (I made a post about it). Recently I discovered Remarkable-web, a very useful tool to extract my highlights. However this should be supported by the very company.

Cal.com is an open-source event-juggling scheduler for everyone, and is free for individuals.

Turborepo is a tool that makes it easy to manage monorepos with pnpm and typescript. On large open source porject like cal.com they use it for fast building or running developing tasks like testing or linting. Turborepo depend havily on caching so it would reduce signficantly the time to build or run the tasks as well as CI/CD pipelines time and cost.

The next codebase to analyse is cal.com. This repo is larger than jsoncrack. It is a monorepo with packages and lots of stuff going behind the scenes.

hey, peer here from cal.com. we have an issue where we track all individual caldav implementations: https://github.com/calcom/cal.com/issues/9990

Cal - Alternative to Calendly

I force clients who want to talk to me to book a call. I use cal.com (free) and my Google Calendar (which its linked to) only allows calls on specific days/times. I have a few "Call Blocks" where they can book. That let's me do calls in a small section of my week, with ample downtime to recover the rest of the week. I'm still learning how many calls a day I can handle. Currently anything more than 2 is too much.

Cal.com- Cal.com is a scheduling tool that helps you schedule meetings without the back-and-forth emails.

Peer Rich (CEO at Cal.com)

Has any one deployed cal.com with selfhosted environment. Is yes how would have configured prisma for the same.

Recently I came across a company called cal.com, it's a Calendly alternative, but the catch is the entire software is open source: https://github.com/calcom/cal.com.