radzionkit VS searchkit

In this article, I'll show you how to set up email addresses for your AWS domain at almost no cost. I've successfully implemented this technique for my domain, radzion.com, as well as for two of my projects: increaser.org and georgiancitizen.com. This method is straightforward, requiring only a single AWS Lambda function and no additional costs as you add more domains. You can find everything needed to deploy this solution, including both the Terraform infrastructure and the Lambda function source code, in the RadzionKit repository—a comprehensive toolkit designed to jumpstart full-stack projects within a monorepo.

In this article, we'll construct a stunning report featuring filters, a table, a pie chart, and a line chart for an existing time-tracking application, all without the use of component libraries. Utilizing React, TypeScript, and CSS, we'll develop reusable components that simplify the creation of complex UIs with minimal effort. Although the Increaser codebase is private, you can find all the reusable components and utilities in the RadzionKit repository.

You can also see all the reusable utilities and components from the ReactKit repository.

Overall, we'll make the process of meta tagging straightforward and efficient - all with the help of my comprehensive guide. And don't worry, the full source code can be found in our ReactKit repository.

For the coding enthusiasts, the complete source code can be found here: https://github.com/radzionc/reactkit

Lastly, If you're curious to explore more about this or want to dive into the code, you can access the complete source code on my GitHub profile at ReactKit. I encourage you guys to take a look and utilize these methods in your own projects.

In this post, we'll dive into an intriguing topic: creating TypeScript functions that will enhance our codebase by generating TypeScript code. If you've ever worked with type generation from a GraphQL or database schema, you'll appreciate the convenience of these auto-generated types. Imagine having to manually write them each time the schema changes! While there might not always be a library tailored to our specific needs, fear not. Crafting our own code generator is straightforward. Rather than addressing a hypothetical issue, I'll guide you through a real use-case I encountered. The final demonstration is available on this demo page, and you can access the complete source code in my ReactKit repository.

Moreover, for those interested in the broader components used in this implementation, I've made my ReactKit repository public. ReactKit is a comprehensive collection of reusable components, hooks, and utilities.

Every app needs a popup dialog that is accessible, responsive, and aesthetically pleasing. However, we also want it to be convenient to use for us developers. In this post, I will share with you a minimalistic Modal component which I utilize in my projects, and which does not require any component libraries. You can find all of the source code in the ReactKit repository.

In this tutorial, I use the Increaser codebase and for reusable hooks, components, and utility tools, I dive into my public ReactKit repository.

https://github.com/searchkit/searchkit is an instantsearch adapter for elasticsearch / opensearch

One example of this pattern is Searchkit [0] which performs most of its logic inside a singleton Searchkit class which is instantiated and passed as a prop to the root React component. A bonus is that it's easier to implement bindings for Angular, Svelte, etc. since they can rely mostly on the class. For example, it looks like Searchkit now suggests using InstantSearch (react-instantsearch-dom) [1] from Algolia, i.e. an entirely different maintainer, and it creates the bindings with a `Client(new SearchKit(...))` adapter [2] around the class (see the code on the home page at [0]).

[0] https://www.searchkit.co/

[1] https://github.com/algolia/instantsearch

[2] https://github.com/searchkit/searchkit/blob/main/packages/se...

We will use React, Next.JS, Instantsearch and Searchkit to build a search UI.

I think you are probably spending too much of your time on software and too little time on marketing.

When I look at an open-source project, I ask myself three things:

1) What does it do exactly?

2) Is this easy to get started with?

3) Does it have any documentation?

For example, I have a use case for wanting to use graphql to communicate with elasticsearch. I google "graphql + elasticsearch" and somewhere a link to https://www.searchkit.co/ comes up. I look at it and I find my answers within 60 seconds:

1) Top of the page I see "Searchkit is an open source library which helps you build a great search experience with Elasticsearch. Powered by Apollo GraphQL." This makes me think that yeah, it's probably looking to solve a similar problem to me. In case I had any doubts, there's a demo.

2) Yes, easy to get started. There's a big "get started" button at the top of the page. And a get-started-video link at the bottom of the homepage.

3) At a glance, yes, it has decent documentation.

Given that I quickly got answers to these 3 questions, yes, I might consider using this project, or at least trying it out.

When I go to your page, I see:

1) River DB is a Rust connection pool and middleware proxy... ok... why do i need that? What problem is this solving? There's a long paragraph I can read after that, but when i'm browsing the web i don't usually read long paragraphs, so you've lost me already.

2) I have no idea how to get started

3) Doesn't look like there's any docs

Given the above, why would I use your software?

Note that the above has nothing to do with your software quality. But people only care about your code if things are breaking. Marketing material is what gets them in the door. For example, I use React all the time. I have NO IDEA if the underlying code is any good. And I don't really care. What I care about is that it's easy to use.

Anyway, long story short... if you want to build a software business, coding is maybe 30-40% of the job. Marketing, sales, documentation and all that jazz is probably the majority of the work. If you don't want to do that and you just want to code, then great, get a job. People will pay you good money for that.