racket-langserver VS scheme-langserver

The racket-langserver is an interesting approach in that it exposes existing functionality via the LSP protocol. https://github.com/jeapostrophe/racket-langserver

I was suggesting a language level with editor support was achievable. Full interop between racket(cs) and chez would be significant work. I still think the OPs idea (Chez support in DrRacket) is a good one. Does Chez have LSP support like racket langserver?

I’m trying to get the Racket lsp to work with Eglot but I’m having trouble. First off, I see two different implementations of an lsp. This one https://github.com/theia-ide/racket-language-server and this one https://github.com/jeapostrophe/racket-langserver. Which one should I use?

You may be able to run it with Xvfb.

https://github.com/jeapostrophe/racket-langserver/issues/45

IDE not included? racket-langserver is a Language Server Protocol implementation for Racket

I've just released 1.0.11:Gradual Typing system, all basic rules have been passed (you can verify it with test/analysis/type/*.sps and test/analysis/type/rules/*.sps). Detailed documentation has been published at this page.

The coolest thing I've done is now I can code scheme lisp with help from my own LSP server named named scheme-langserver. With nvim-lspconfig and many other plugins, developing is really friendly. And many convenient fucntionalities such as autocompletion, goto definition are really helped and will help other lisp coder. Now, I hope my work will make NeoVim the better lisp editor than Emacs Lol.

NOTE:https://github.com/ufo5260987423/scheme-langserver/blob/main/doc/analysis/identifier.md this page has listed the "Identifier binding forms in r6rs standard".