pulsar-jms VS Apache ActiveMQ Artemis

Compare pulsar-jms vs Apache ActiveMQ Artemis and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
pulsar-jms Apache ActiveMQ Artemis
1 2
47 913
- 0.3%
6.4 9.7
12 days ago 4 days ago
Java Java
Apache License 2.0 Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

pulsar-jms

Posts with mentions or reviews of pulsar-jms. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-11-10.
  • Improving Developer Productivity at Disney with Serverless and Open Source
    6 projects | /r/java | 10 Nov 2022
    While Pulsar has its own protocol that handles streaming, queues, and a lot of the other features (distributed transactions, functions, etc.), it can also speak other messaging protocols via plug-ins. Looking around, the ones that appear to be actively developed are MQTT, Kafka (so your existing applications that use Kafka can also use Pulsar), AMQP, and JMS.

Apache ActiveMQ Artemis

Posts with mentions or reviews of Apache ActiveMQ Artemis. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-05-12.