Nyholm PSR-7 VS Packagist

As the documentation states, this package only performs the conversion, so we would need a PSR-7 and a PSR-17 implementation to convert the objects to and from PSR-7. We can use the library the documentation recommends, nyholm/psr7, but there are others.

The following example shows how to create configuration for the HTTP factories, using the nyholm/psr7 package:

Since the library is designed to be easily integrated with different frameworks, it relies on the usage of PSR-7 compliant HTTP messages. To fulfill this requirement, I'll be using the nyholm/psr7 package.

If you go strict PSR-7, as you see in nyholm/psr7, Tobias uses traits to add the functionality of the extended RequestInterface and MessageInterface:

The Symfony folks thought of this, however, and provided a bridge that converts HttpFoundation objects to PSR-7 ones. The bridge simply needs a PSR-7 and PSR-17 factory, for which they suggest to use Tobias Nyholm's PSR-7 implementation.

“In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not.” (Dr. Albert Einstein). I believe same goes for packages, too. A good example is the [comparison](https://github.com/Nyholm/psr7) of some PSR-7 implementations.

The point is why would I pull in code in the first place that is not needed? If it is optional, then why is it not a separate package? Same with all of the bloated HTTP requests and response objects that frameworks and other libs usually use. I really like https://github.com/Nyholm/psr7 for that reason, it has a table in it's readme.md that is pretty much enough to know why I like it. If something specific is needed it can be decorated or extended on project level.

What will we do next time? Actually, the whole package is ready, and all that's left is to publish it on Packagist.

publishing our work on https://packagist.org/

The latter one is based on nix OS using Symfony flex recipes and PHP packagist composer. The flex devenv should work cross-platform on Linux, Windows, and Mac. "The main difference to other tools like Docker or a VM is that it neither uses containerization nor virtualization techniques. Instead, the services run natively on your machine."

Composer is (still) the defacto standard package manager, with the Packagist repo being the standard place to find and install libraries.

Sorta—it looks like they were most enforced by convention until May 2015, when they finally become enforced [0]. Still, that's a good one that I hadn't thought of, and they at least had the convention in place.

[0] https://github.com/composer/packagist/issues/163#issuecommen...

Scanning your image for vulnerabilities is a critical step before you deploy it to production. You can use Snyk to scan your PHP Docker image and identify and resolve vulnerabilities. The Snyk Vulnerability Database includes records for all popular operating systems and dependencies, including PHP packages published to Packagist.

No. The only linked commercial thing I know - is Nova admin panel interface lib. But you don't have to use it. (Filament or Encore are free and suitable). Modules are free ( packagist.org and gthub.com ) and you should handle them with standard composer package tool. But you need to code. It is not WordPress like CMS

Once you understand the underlying principles of a concept, you're free to find a library via packagist.org to use.

For strings I use Stringy (https://github.com/danielstjules/Stringy) for arrays I built my own Collection library, but pretty sure there are plenty in packagist (https://packagist.org/)

I guess I tried downloading a old version. and have to download a newer version of apiclient I found on https://packagist.org/packages/google/apiclient with monolog/monolog: ^2.9||^3.0. I'll try that in a second, I am away from computer now.