proposal-decorators
arktype
Our great sponsors
proposal-decorators | arktype | |
---|---|---|
64 | 41 | |
2,646 | 3,364 | |
1.2% | 4.3% | |
4.2 | 7.9 | |
about 2 months ago | 4 days ago | |
TypeScript | ||
- | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
proposal-decorators
-
Making Web Component properties behave closer to the platform
Because many rules are common to many attributes (the coerceType operation is defined by WebIDL, or using similar rules, and the HTML specification defines a handful of microsyntaxes for the parseValue and stringifyValue operations), those could be packaged up in a helper library. And with decorators coming to ECMAScript (and already available in TypeScript), those could be greatly simplified:
-
The case for using decorators in your codebase
Decorators are currently not a part of the standard JavaScript language. They are still being discussed in tc39 and have reached proposal stage 3. This means the spec has more or less stabilized and we can use them but they would be transplied before being run in the browser. This would be done via babel or tsc for most users
-
JavaScript Naming Conventions are Important
JavaScript was created a long time ago, and at the time of its inception, the authors decided not to use affirmative prefixes for boolean names. Now, they do their best by continuing to follow their convention, even if it goes against the community's opinion. Even if the authors wanted to introduce new naming conventions in the specification, they could not do it, at least not coherently. Old code cannot be renamed because JavaScript must remain backward-compatible. And starting to write new code using new approaches is not a great idea either, as there would be two ways to do the same thing, which is also undesirable.
-
ECMAScript Decorators. The Ones That are Real
2016-07 – Stage 2. After the decorators proposal reached stage 2, its API began to undergo significant changes. Furthermore, at one point the proposal was referred to as "ESnext class features for JavaScript." During its development, there were numerous ideas about how decorators could be structured. To get a comprehensive view of the entire history of changes, I recommend reviewing the commits in the proposal's repository. Here is an example of what the decorators API used to look like:
-
Strawberry - Zero-Dependency, Build-Free JavaScript Framework
The example you've given isn't valid JavaScript, JS doesn't have decorators. (Although there is a stage 3 tc39 for it, afaik no browser has implemented it)
-
Updates from the 96th TC39 meeting
There was a decorators issue brought up in the meeting (issue 508) and decorators metadata, as noted in the article, is now at stage 3. So there's still active work being done on decorators. If I had to guess, I'd say they'd be a likely candidate for ES2024.
-
The Lightweight Alternative to GraphQL, Resolvers Instead of Endpoints
As per the proposal, decorators can be used with Classes and their elements such as fields, methods, and accessors. To leverage this feature, we need to ensure that our resolvers provider is an instance of a Class. Therefore, we will modify the code in src/api/users/users-resolvers.js to the following:
-
Using modern decorators in TypeScript
The modern version of decorators, which will be officially rolled out in TypeScript 5.0, no longer requires a compiler flag and follows the official ECMAScript Stage-3 proposal. Alongside a stable implementation that follows ECMAScript standards, decorators now work seamlessly with the TypeScript type system, enabling more enhanced functionality than the original version.
-
What should I do after react js
100% this. Going in depth of libraries will make you so much better developer than learning newest and coolest frameworks in JS ecosystem. Learn to create your own React, Promises, or anything you like in JS. It will give you immense perspective about these libraries. Once you start understanding them you will feel like they are not that complex and you can do it too. Go read TC39 proposals and issues people point out in them. You will see how JS is borrowing features from other languages.
-
Announcing TypeScript 5.0
The actual proposal gives the "@reactive" decorator as the first example, which just so happens is the only decorator that I use in my library with TypeScript's legacy decorator option. Was so happy to see they recognize this use case! https://github.com/tc39/proposal-decorators
arktype
-
Library for benchmarking TS types
I primarily rely on that approach to benchmark ArkType's types.
- Introducing @arktype/attest: A new approach to type-level testing and benchmarks
-
TypeScript please give us types
I was one of the most outspoken supporters of this initiative until I started working on ArkType. That may sound oddly self-serving, and it would be naive to claim objectivity after having invested so much into my own solution to this problem. However, I don't think that's the primary reason I changed my mind.
Since it's not explicitly listed there, I feel I should shout out David Blass and his incredibly cool ArkType project: https://github.com/arktypeio/arktype
He sometimes (used to?) streams himself working on twitch and it's a really comfy place to hang out: https://www.twitch.tv/arktypeio
-
Using ArkType for TypeScript runtime validation
ArkType is a runtime validation library that can infer TypeScript definitions one-to-one and reuse them as highly-optimized validators for your data.
-
preferred way to type guard api response body?
Could also try ArkType if you haven't seen it.
-
Valid runtime typing with Dilav
How would you say the functional chaining style overall compares to a parsed syntax like ArkType?
-
Can someone recommend a library for data parsing similar to Zod, but with better support for input transformations/preprocessing?
I'm working on a library called ArkType maybe of interest to you.
-
Solving balanced parentheses problem using Dart's type system
If you're interested in the possibilities of this kind of stuff in TypeScript, you should check out ArkType.
-
Safer Type Checking At Both Runtime and Compile Time
Have you tried ArkType?
What are some alternatives?
openapi-typescript - Generate TypeScript types from OpenAPI 3 specs
zod - TypeScript-first schema validation with static type inference
proposals - Tracking ECMAScript Proposals
trpc - 🧙♀️ Move Fast and Break Nothing. End-to-end typesafe APIs made easy.
remult - Full-stack CRUD, simplified, with SSOT TypeScript entities
monorepo
TypeORM - ORM for TypeScript and JavaScript. Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, SQLite, MS SQL Server, Oracle, SAP Hana, WebSQL databases. Works in NodeJS, Browser, Ionic, Cordova and Electron platforms.
type-level-regexp - 🔤🔍 Type-level RegExp, parse and match string in TypeScript type system.
proposal-decorator-metadata
typescript-runtime-type-benchmarks - 📊 Benchmark Comparison of Packages with Runtime Validation and TypeScript Support
reflex-metadata-SCKS
typebox - Json Schema Type Builder with Static Type Resolution for TypeScript