proposal-common-minimum-api
By wintercg
now
Node on Web (by cemalgnlts)
proposal-common-minimum-api | now | |
---|---|---|
7 | 8 | |
208 | 3 | |
4.3% | - | |
4.7 | 3.4 | |
about 1 month ago | 11 months ago | |
Bikeshed | JavaScript | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
proposal-common-minimum-api
Posts with mentions or reviews of proposal-common-minimum-api.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-12-10.
-
Can you make your own JavaScript by implementing ECMAScript standard?
If you are considering building a modern JavaScript runtime I would suggest reading Minimum Common API.
-
All all Web API interfaces actually JavaScript objects?
Deno, CloudFlare Workerd, VM Labs WASM Worker Server, and others use some semblance of the ServiceWorker onfetch pattern as a server implementation. Why? Because onfetch of a ServiceWorker with Response() used to send a response to the client is ergonomic. Web API's being implemented by JavaScript runtimes that do not target the browser. In order to try to normalize implementation of Web API's for compatibility there is https://github.com/wintercg/proposal-common-minimum-api.
-
Simple requirement: Bundle dependencies into a single script. esbuild, webpack, bun build throw errors. Solution?
I guess you do not support Minimum Common API even though Node.js does?
-
JavaScript Standard Input/Output: Unspecified
Common I/O (stdin/stdout/stderr) module specification #47.
-
Node.js fetch() vs. Deno fetch(): Implementation details...
My goal for one part of this project was to use the same fetch() code in a Node.js and Deno Native Messaging host, respectively, in the spirit of Minimum Common API
-
how to improve nodejs startup times
The premise of this question is precisely why I filed Single HTTPS server for QuickJS, Bun, Deno, Node.js - without reliance on either to build #33. Closed as
now
Posts with mentions or reviews of now.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-12-10.
-
Can you make your own JavaScript by implementing ECMAScript standard?
Technically you can run Node.js in the browser right now now.
-
Can you use JavaScript to create an app that installs Node.Js then deploys the (or an) app?
Here is an example of downloading Node.js, extracting node executable, compiling to WASM to use node in the browser https://github.com/cemalgnlts/now.
-
What sorts of things would you consider to be “advanced” javascript concepts?
Just to demonstrate how finicky folks on this r/learnjavascript are: I shared this Node on Web. Use Nodejs freely in your browser with Linux infrastructure. here and on r/node. r/node folks get it, that is, the work that had to go in to making that a reality. Folks on this r/learnjavascript evidently don't get the effort it took to make that so, after StackBlitz announced "... run Node.js, entirely inside your browser" only to walk back from that claim here https://github.com/stackblitz/webcontainer-core/issues/658#issuecomment-1091004244 "We currently do not expose a way to use WebContainer outside of StackBlitz.com".
- Node on Web. Use Nodejs freely in your browser with Linux infrastructure.
- This website lets you run linux in browser
-
IT department refuses to let me install Python and other programs/languages I need for my job.
For running programming languages other than JavaScript in the browser there is Emscripten and WebAssembly. There is v86, where a Linux build is compiled to WASM. Folks have written QuickJS into a Linux build compiled to WASM, Node.js into the Linux buildroot https://github.com/cemalgnlts/now, so Python or CPython can be written to the image and loaded into the browser as WASM as well https://github.com/pyodide/pyodide.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing proposal-common-minimum-api and now you can also consider the following projects:
native-messaging-bun - Bun Native Messaging host
js-compute-runtime - JavaScript SDK and runtime for building Fastly Compute applications
native-messaging-quickjs - QuickJS Native Messaging host
wasm-workers-server - 🚀 Develop and run serverless applications on WebAssembly
AudioWorkletStream - fetch() => ReadableStream => AudioWorklet
sm-wasi-demo - Online SpiderMonkey WASI shell
native-messaging-nodejs - Node.js Native Messaging host
jor1k - Online OR1K Emulator running Linux
fetch - Fetch Standard
browser-shell - A Linux command-line shell in the browser
webbundle-plugins - A Webpack plugin for generating Web Bundles output.
v86 - x86 PC emulator and x86-to-wasm JIT, running in the browser
proposal-common-minimum-api vs native-messaging-bun
now vs js-compute-runtime
proposal-common-minimum-api vs native-messaging-quickjs
now vs wasm-workers-server
proposal-common-minimum-api vs AudioWorkletStream
now vs sm-wasi-demo
proposal-common-minimum-api vs native-messaging-nodejs
now vs jor1k
proposal-common-minimum-api vs fetch
now vs browser-shell
proposal-common-minimum-api vs webbundle-plugins
now vs v86